ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2024
Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Longitudinal Characteristics Associated With Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in HFpEF: Distinguishing Drug-Specific Response from Prognostic Phenotypes Across Randomized Trials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- In-Hospital Improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Prognosis in Acute Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Echocardiographic Trajectories of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- A contemporary review on heart failure with improved ejection fraction.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- B-type Natriuretic Peptide Changes and Left Ventricular Remodeling Dynamics in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- B-type natriuretic peptide changes and left ventricular remodeling dynamics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Beyond the Initial Insult: Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction.Cardiology · 2025Article
- Myocardial Recovery and Relapse in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical Perspective of Myocardial Recovery and Improvement: Definitions, Prevalence, and Relevance.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Outpatients with Improvement in Ejection Fraction in Qatar.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) has better outcomes than HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). However, factors contributing to HFimpEF remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate clinical and longitudinal characteristics associated with subsequent HFimpEF. This was a single-center retrospective HFrEF cohort study. Data were collected from 2014 to 2022. Patients with HFrEF were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes, echocardiographic data, and natriuretic peptide levels. The main end points were HFimpEF (defined as EF >40% at ≥3 months with ≥10% increase) and mortality. Cox proportional hazards and mixed effects models were used for analyses. The study included 1,307 patients with HFrEF with a median follow-up of 16.3 months (interquartile range 8.0 to 30.6). The median age was 65 years; 68% were male whereas 57% were White. On follow-up, 38.7% (n = 506) developed HFimpEF, whereas 61.3% (n = 801) had persistent HFrEF. A multivariate Cox regression model identified gender, race, co-morbidities, echocardiographic, and natriuretic peptide as significant covariates of HFimpEF (p <0.05). The HFimpEF group had better survival compared with the persistent HFrEF group (p <0.001). Echocardiographic and laboratory trajectories differed between groups. In this HFrEF cohort, 38.7% transitioned to HFimpEF and approximately 50% met the definition within the first 12 months. In a HFimpEF model, gender, co-morbidities, echocardiographic parameters, and natriuretic peptide were associated with subsequent HFimpEF. The model has the potential to identify patients at risk of subsequent persistent or improved HFrEF, thus informing the design and implementation of targeted quality-of-care improvement interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.