Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37922496›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2025

Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Bone Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Based on SHapley Additive exPlanations.

Yi-Li Hu, Pei-Yang Wang, Zhi-Yang Xie, Guan-Rui Ren, Cong Zhang, Hang-Yu Ji, Xin-Hui Xie, Su-Yang Zhuang, Xiao-Tao Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of basivertebral foramen and its clinical significance.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi-Li HuDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0009-0008-1525-2629
Pei-Yang WangDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4298-8147
Zhi-Yang XieDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Guan-Rui RenDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Cong ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Hang-Yu JiDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Xin-Hui XieDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Su-Yang ZhuangDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Xiao-Tao WuDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective study.

objectivesOur objective is to create comprehensible machine learning (ML) models that can forecast bone cement leakage in percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) for individuals with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) while also identifying the associated risk factors.

methodsWe incorporated data from patients (n = 425) which underwent PVA. To predict cement leakage, we devised six models based on a variety of parameters. Evaluate and juxtapose the predictive performances relied on measures of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methodology was used to interpret model and evaluate the risk factors associated with cement leakage.

resultsThe occurrence rate of cement leakage was established at 50.4%. A binary logistic regression analysis identified cortical disruption (OR 6.880, 95% CI 4.209-11.246), the basivertebral foramen sign (OR 2.142, 95% CI 1.303-3.521), the fracture type (OR 1.683, 95% CI 1.083-2.617), and the volume of bone cement (OR 1.198, 95% CI 1.070-1.341) as independent predictors of cement leakage. The XGBoost model outperformed all others in predicting cement leakage in the testing set, with AUC of .8819, accuracy of .8025, recall score of .7872, F1 score of .8315, and a precision score of .881. Several important factors related to cement leakage were drawn based on the analysis of SHAP values and their clinical significance.

conclusionThe ML based predictive model demonstrated significant accuracy in forecasting bone cement leakage for patients with OVCF undergoing PVA. When combined with SHAP, ML facilitated a personalized prediction and offered a visual interpretation of feature importance.

Indexed as

bone cement leakageinterpretable modelmachine learningosteoporotic vertebral compression fracturepercutaneous vertebral augmentationSHapley Additive exPlanations values

Identifiers

PMID37922496
PMCPMC11881125
OpenAlexW4388280977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.