Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37922320›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2024

Diabetes Distress and Associations With Demographic and Clinical Variables: A Nationwide Population-Based Registry Study of 10,186 Adults With Type 1 Diabetes in Norway.

Ingvild Hernar, John G Cooper, Roy M Nilsen, Timothy C Skinner, Ragnhild B Strandberg, Marjolein M Iversen, Marit Graue, Tony Ernes, Karianne F Løvaas, Tone V Madsen and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2024
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ingvild HernarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7185-6234
John G CooperNorwegian Diabetes Register for Adults, Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Roy M NilsenDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Timothy C SkinnerInstitute of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-6963
Ragnhild B StrandbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0256-438X
Marjolein M IversenDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-171X
Marit GraueDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Tony ErnesNorwegian Diabetes Register for Adults, Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Karianne F LøvaasNorwegian Diabetes Register for Adults, Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Tone V MadsenNorwegian Diabetes Register for Adults, Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Silje S LieDepartment of Health, VID Specialized University, Stavanger, Norway.
David A RichardsDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Grethe Å UelandDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Anne HaugstvedtDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Helse Vest F-12610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate diabetes distress prevalence and associations with demographic and clinical variables among adults with type 1 diabetes in Norway. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn this nationwide population-based registry study, the 20-item Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-20) questionnaire was sent to 16,255 adults with type 1 diabetes. Linear regression models examined associations of demographic and clinical variables with distress.

resultsIn total, 10,186 individuals (62.7%) completed the PAID-20, with a mean score of 25.4 (SD 18.4) and 21.7% reporting high distress. Respondents endorsed worrying about the future and complications as the most problematic item (23.0%). Female sex, younger age, non-European origin, primary education only, unemployment, smoking, continuous glucose monitoring use, more symptomatic hypoglycemia, reduced foot sensitivity, treated retinopathy, and higher HbA1c were associated with higher distress.

conclusionsDiabetes distress is common among adults with type 1 diabetes and associated with clinically relevant factors, underlining that regular care should include efforts to identify and address distress.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDemographyFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansNorwayBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID37922320
PMCPMC10733651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.