ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2023
Anti-oxidative activities and anti-ferroptosis of conditioned medium from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activation of Nrf2 with natural flavonoids and mesenchymal stromal/stem cells: mechanisms and therapeutic potential for inflammatory diseases.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The therapeutic effect of MSC is closely related to its antioxidant capacity. There is no uniform standard for evaluating the antioxidant capacity of MSC. In this study, we compared the antioxidant capacity of control medium (CON) and conditioned medium (CM) from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells cultured for 48 h, about total antioxidant capacity, DPPH scavenging capacity, O2- and hydroxyl radical inhibiting capacity, and the detection of antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase, and resistance to cellular oxidative damage caused by H2O2, SNAP, erastin, and RSL3. The results showed that CM had better DPPH scavenging capacity than CON. No significant differences were observed in antioxidant enzymes. CM did not resist the oxidative damage induced by H2O2 and SNAP, but it had a strong resistance to ferroptosis induced by erastin and RSL3, indicating that CM had excellent resistance to cell lipid peroxidation. CM could improve the cell shrinkage morphology induced by ferroptosis and reduce the production of lipid ROS. qPCR experiments proved that CM improved and regulated multiple pathways of ferroptosis, including genes related to iron metabolism such as FPN, FTH1, TFRC, and IREB2, and redox regulatory genes such as GPX4, AIFM2, DHODH, and TP53, and increased the antioxidant-related transcription factors NRF2 and ATF4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.