Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37921935›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2023

What is the effect of laser anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate on the ejaculatory functions? A systematic review.

Furkan Guldibi, Abdullah Altunhan, Abdüllatif Aydın, Mehmet Giray Sonmez, Ömer Onur Çakır, Mehmet Balasar, Selcuk Guven, Kamran Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. [Impact of thulium laser enucleation of the prostateBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Furkan GuldibiMeram School of Medicine, Urology Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Abdullah AltunhanMeram School of Medicine, Urology Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Abdüllatif AydınDepartment of Urology, King's College Hospitals, London, UK.
Mehmet Giray SonmezMeram School of Medicine, Urology Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Ömer Onur ÇakırDepartment of Urology, King's College Hospitals, London, UK.
Mehmet BalasarMeram School of Medicine, Urology Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Selcuk GuvenMeram School of Medicine, Urology Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey. selcukguven@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-8435
Kamran AhmedMeram School of Medicine, Urology Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Necmettin Erbakan University · TRGuy's Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaser anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (LAEEP) has emerged as a promising new approach in endoscopic surgery for BPH. LAEEP could still result in ejaculatory dysfunction.

aimThis systematic review aimed to examine the impact of LAEEP on male ejaculatory functions.

methodsThe review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, and 15 records were included. Outcomes of interest included ejaculatory dysfunction (retrograde ejaculation, painful ejaculation, etc.) and validated questionnaire scores. The quality of studies included in the systematic review was determined using QUADAS scoring.

resultsWe retrieved data for 1877 men in 15 clinical studies investigating LAEEP surgery and reporting EjD rates. While only three of the obtained studies were on thulium fiber (ThuLEP), the rest were on holmium (HoLEP). The definition of "Ejaculatory Dysfunction" was not standardized, but in most works, it is referred to as retrograde ejaculation (RE). There were no data on the relationship between other LAEEP techniques and ejaculation functions. The authors compared the outcomes of used standard laser enucleation techniques with the modified techniques. The RE rate in LAEEP was 62.1 ± 25.1%, 71.3 ± 16.1% in standard techniques, and 27.2 ± 18.1% in ejaculation-preserving modified techniques (p < 0.001).

conclusionThis review demonstrated that ejaculation-preserving techniques, i.e., modified techniques are superior to standard techniques. Studies have also shown that ejaculatory dysfunction rates gradually decrease with long-term follow-ups. Future well-designed studies could further investigate the ejaculation-preserving modification of LAEEP techniques and how they impact EjD rates and other sexual function outcomes.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateProstatic HyperplasiaEjaculationEndoscopyHumansMaleProstateAEEPBPHEjaculationHoLEPLaserProstatectomyRetrograde EjaculationThuLEP. EEP

Identifiers

PMID37921935
OpenAlexW4388297202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.