Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37921929›Full record

ArticleMolecular plant pathology2024

Adapting the inoculation methods of kiwifruit canker disease to identify efficient biocontrol bacteria from branch microbiome.

Xiaolong Shao, Qianhua Wu, Li Li, Weimei He, Xueting He, Dongjin Cheng, Aprodisia Murero, Long Lin, Limin Wang, Caihong Zhong and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular plant pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaolong ShaoKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7425-2249
Qianhua WuKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Li LiCAS Engineering Laboratory for Kiwifruit Industrial Technology, CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Weimei HeKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Xueting HeKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Dongjin ChengKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Aprodisia MureroKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Long LinKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Limin WangKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Caihong ZhongCAS Engineering Laboratory for Kiwifruit Industrial Technology, CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Lili HuangState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shanxi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7085-7646
Guoliang QianKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Biological Interactions and Crop Health, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3577-3241
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Plant Protection · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities KJJQ202001Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities KYT201805Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities KYTZ201403National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872016National Natural Science Foundation of China 32072470National Natural Science Foundation of China 32272619National Natural Science Foundation of China U22A20486Natural Key Research and Development Program 2022YFD1400200Science and Technology Project of Shanxi Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation KJ-2022-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), the bacterium that causes kiwifruit bacterial canker, is a common field occurrence that is difficult to control globally. Currently, exploring the resources for efficient biocontrol bacteria is a hot spot in the field. The common strategy for isolating biocontrol bacteria is to directly isolate biocontrol bacteria that can secrete diffusible antibacterial substances, most of which are members of Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Streptomycetaceae, from disease samples or soil. Here, we report a new approach by adapting the typical isolation methods of kiwifruit canker disease to identify efficient biocontrol bacteria from the branch microbiome. Using this unique approach, we isolated a group of kiwifruit biocontrol agents (KBAs) from the branch microbiome of Psa-resistant varieties. Thirteen of these showed no antagonistic activity in vitro, which depends on the secretion of antibacterial compounds. However, they exhibited antibacterial activity via cell-to-cell contacts mimicked by co-culture on agar plates. Through biocontrol tests on plants, two isolates, KBA13 and KBA19, demonstrated their effectiveness by protecting kiwifruit branches from Psa infection. Using KBA19, identified as Pantoea endophytica, as a representative, we found that this bacterium uses the type VI secretion system (T6SS) as the main contact-dependent antibacterial weapon that acts via translocating toxic effector proteins into Psa cells to induce cell death, and that this capacity expressed by KBA19 is common to various Psa strains from different countries. Our findings highlight a new strategy to identify efficient biocontrol agents that use the T6SS to function in an antibacterial metabolite-independent manner to control wood diseases.

Indexed as

ActinidiaPseudomonas syringaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaPlant DiseasesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbiocontrol bacteriabranch microbiomekiwifruit canker disease

Identifiers

PMID37921929
PMCPMC10788592
OpenAlexW4388288522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.