Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37921926›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

HUNCHEST-II contributes to a shift to earlier-stage lung cancer detection: final results of a nationwide screening program.

Anna Kerpel-Fronius, Zsolt Megyesfalvi, Zsolt Markóczy, Diana Solymosi, Péter Csányi, Judit Tisza, Anita Kecskés, Beatrix Baranyi, Eszter Csánky, Adrienn Dóka and 35 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Alpha1-Antitrypsin in Lung Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Observational
  7. Early-stage resectable non-small cell lung cancer in Hungary.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

45 authors.

Anna Kerpel-Fronius *National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary. kerpel.anna@koranyi.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-3366
Zsolt Megyesfalvi *National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt MarkóczyNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Diana SolymosiNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter CsányiNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Judit TiszaNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Anita KecskésNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Beatrix BaranyiBékés County Central Hospital, Békéscsaba, Hungary.
Eszter CsánkyBorsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Hospital and University Teaching Hospital - Semmelweis Member State Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary.
Adrienn DókaVas County Markusovszky University Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary.
Gabriella GálffyTörökbálint Institute of Pulmonology, Törökbálint, Hungary.
Katalin GöczőBács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary.
Csilla GyőryPetz Aladár University Teaching Hospital, Győr, Hungary.
Zsolt HorváthBács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary.
Tünde JuhászSzabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County Hospitals and University Teaching, Nyíregyháza, Hungary.
Árpád KállaiHódmezővásárhely- Makó Healthcare Services Center, Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary.
Zsigmond T KincsesDepartment of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsolt KirályPulmonological Institute of Veszprém County, Farkasgyepű, Hungary.
Enikő Király-InczeFejér County Szent György University Teaching Hospital, Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
László KostyálBorsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Hospital and University Teaching Hospital - Semmelweis Member State Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary.
Anita KovácsDepartment of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
András KovácsMedical School and Clinical Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Éva KuczkóSomogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna MakraHódmezővásárhely- Makó Healthcare Services Center, Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary.
Pál Maurovich HorvátSemmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gabriella MerthMediConcept, Budapest, Hungary.
István MoldoványiVeszprém County Csolnoky Ferenc Hospital, Veszprém, Hungary.
Veronika MüllerSemmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt Pápai-SzékelyFejér County Szent György University Teaching Hospital, Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
Dávid PappSomogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Csaba PolgárNational Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter RózsaMedical School and Clinical Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Veronika SárosiMedical School and Clinical Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna SzalaiPetz Aladár University Teaching Hospital, Győr, Hungary.
András SzékelyUniversity of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Marianna SzuhácsSzabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County Hospitals and University Teaching, Nyíregyháza, Hungary.
Dávid TárnokiNational Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor TavasziTörökbálint Institute of Pulmonology, Törökbálint, Hungary.
Róbert Turóczi-KirizsNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
László TóthMátra Hospital, Gyöngyös, Hungary.
László UrbánMátra Hospital, Gyöngyös, Hungary.
Attila VaskóUniversity of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Éva VighVas County Markusovszky University Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary.
Balazs DomeNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary. balazs.dome@meduniwien.ac.at.
Krisztina BogosNational Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3522Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3977Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4677Emberi Eroforrások Minisztériuma IV/2839-4/2021/EKFHungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office 2020-1.1.6-JÖVŐHungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office FK-143751Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office TKP2021-EGA-33International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Young Investigator Grant (2022)Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Bolyai Research Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe introduction of low-dose CT (LDCT) altered the landscape of lung cancer (LC) screening and contributed to the reduction of mortality rates worldwide. Here we report the final results of HUNCHEST-II, the largest population-based LDCT screening program in Hungary, including the screening and diagnostic outcomes, and the characteristics of the LC cases.

methodsA total of 4215 high-risk individuals aged between 50 and 75 years with a smoking history of at least 25 pack-years were assigned to undergo LDCT screening. Screening outcomes were determined based on the volume, growth, and volume doubling time of pulmonary nodules or masses. The clinical stage distribution of screen-detected cancers was compared with two independent practice-based databases consisting of unscreened LC patients.

resultsThe percentage of negative and indeterminate tests at baseline were 74.2% and 21.7%, respectively, whereas the prevalence of positive LDCT results was 4.1%. Overall, 76 LC patients were diagnosed throughout the screening rounds (1.8% of total participants), out of which 62 (1.5%) patients were already identified in the first screening round. The overall positive predictive value of a positive test was 58%. Most screen-detected malignancies were stage I LCs (60.7%), and only 16.4% of all cases could be classified as stage IV disease. The percentage of early-stage malignancies was significantly higher among HUNCHEST-II screen-detected individuals than among the LC patients in the National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology's archive or the Hungarian Cancer Registry (p < 0.001).

conclusionsHUNCHEST-II demonstrates that LDCT screening for LC facilitates early diagnosis, thus arguing in favor of introducing systematic LC screening in Hungary. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: HUNCHEST-II is the so-far largest population-based low-dose CT screening program in Hungary. A positive test's overall positive predictive value was 58%, and most screen-detected malignancies were early-stage lesions. These results pave the way for expansive systematic screening in the region. KEY POINTS: • Conducted in 18 medical facilities, HUNCHEST-II is the so far largest population-based low-dose CT screening program in Hungary. • The vast majority of screen-detected malignancies were early-stage lung cancers, and the overall positive predictive value of a positive test was 58%. • HUNCHEST-II facilitates early diagnosis, thus arguing in favor of introducing systematic lung cancer screening in Hungary.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedEarly detectionLow-dose computed tomography screeningLung cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.