Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37921871›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[iMED DENT-First in place model curriculum in dentistry in Germany].

Andreas H Guse, Thomas Beikler, Guido Heydecke, Martin Gosau, Bärbel Kahl-Nieke

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas H GuseDekanat der Medizinischen Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. guse@uke.de.
Thomas BeiklerPoliklinik für Parodontologie, Präventive Zahnmedizin und Zahnerhaltung, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Guido HeydeckePoliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Martin GosauKlinik für Mund‑, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Bärbel Kahl-NiekePoliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

October 2019 saw the launch of iMED DENT, the first model study program in dentistry in Germany. The launch was preceded by a development process lasting several years in which European locations, among others, with innovative dental study programs were initially visited. The central reform objective of the model study program was then defined: the development, implementation, and ongoing optimization of an interdisciplinary curriculum with a scientific focus that integrates theoretical and practical dental content. Further steps were the development of the study program objectives and the modular study structure. The latter consists of the three parts: "Normal Function," "From Symptom to Disease," and "Therapy." In the curriculum, the central area of dentistry is flanked by basic and clinical medical subjects. This article reports on the important development steps of the model study program, its structure, and quality assurance measures. First evaluations of the achievement of study program objectives and the need for optimization in the current curriculum are presented.

Indexed as

CurriculumDentistryGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesDentistryModel study programModular study program structureQuality assuranceStudy program objectives

Identifiers

PMID37921871
PMCPMC10667459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.