Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37921765›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Speed and Nighttime Usage Restrictions and the Incidence of Shared Electric Scooter Injuries.

Oskari Pakarinen, Arja Kobylin, Veli-Pekka Harjola, Maaret Castrén, Henri Vasara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical impact and economic burden of electric scooter-related facial fractures in Barcelona.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Alcohol and electric scooter injuries in an emergency department: a prospective observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oskari PakarinenDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Arja KobylinDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Veli-Pekka HarjolaDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Maaret CastrénDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Henri VasaraDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Electric scooter (e-scooter) crashes have become a serious health issue worldwide. The need for effective e-scooter regulations has been established in numerous instances. Objective: To investigate the association of restrictions on top speed and nighttime usage on the incidence of e-scooter-related injuries. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective comparative cohort study of all patients with an injury related to shared e-scooter riding sustained in Helsinki, Finland. Data were collected from the electric patient database from 3 trauma hospitals representing all public hospitals treating patients with acute trauma in Helsinki. Shared e-scooter injuries from 2 periods were compared: an unrestricted period (January 1 to August 31, 2021) and a restricted period (January 1 to August 31, 2022). Data were analyzed from September 2022 to September 2023. Exposures: The restrictions established for shared e-scooters during the restricted period were: (1) the daytime top speed of 20 km/h, as opposed to the previous top speed of 25 km/h, (2) the use of shared e-scooters was prohibited on Friday and Saturday nights between 12 am and 5 am, and (3) the nighttime top speed was decreased to 15 km/h from Sunday to Thursday between 12 am and 5 am, as opposed to 25 km/h. Main outcome: The incidence of e-scooter injuries compared with the total trips made by e-scooters. Results: There were 528 e-scooter injuries requiring hospital care during the unrestricted period and 318 injuries during the restricted period of similar length. The median (IQR) age of the patients in the study periods was 25 (21-32) and 28 (22-37), respectively; 308 (58%) and 191 (60%) were male, respectively. The incidence of e-scooter injuries was 19 (95% CI, 17-20) for every 100 000 rides during the unrestricted period and 9 (95% CI, 8-10) per 100 000 rides during the restricted period. In the risk analysis, the odds ratio for shared e-scooter injuries was 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.6) for the restricted period when adjusted for hourly temperature, rain amount, wind speed, and visibility. After introducing the restrictions, the number of e-scooter injuries decreased significantly between 11 pm and 5 am. Conclusion and Relevance: The number of injuries decreased after implementing restrictions on the top speed and nighttime usage of e-scooters. Similar restrictions in cities with shared e-scooter services should be explored.

Indexed as

HospitalsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37921765
PMCPMC10625032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.