Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37921468›Full record

ReviewHistology and histopathology2024

Atypical meningioma: Histopathological, genetic, and epigenetic features to predict recurrence risk.

Elena Marastoni, Valeria Barresi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Histology and histopathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena MarastoniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Valeria BarresiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. valeria.barresi@univr.it.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grading assessed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria is a major prognostic factor for determining the risk of recurrence in patients with meningiomas and establishing the most appropriate therapeutic strategy after surgery. However, the main issue is to predict the recurrence risk of WHO grade 2 meningioma and, more specifically, of the atypical subtype. Indeed, owing to a reported recurrence rate of 50%, either radiotherapy or observation is currently considered an option after gross total surgical resection of atypical meningiomas. These heterogeneous clinical outcomes are likely related to the broad histopathological diagnostic criteria for this subtype, and whether meningiomas only present as brain invasion should be classified as atypical remains controversial. Over the last few years, several studies have shown that DNA methylation profiling, next-generation sequencing, and transcriptomics can better stratify meningiomas for their recurrence risk than histology. The main limitations to the widespread use of these approaches to classify meningiomas are their high cost and the need for sophisticated technologies. However, all studies concurred that atypical meningiomas without chromosome 1p deletion display a low recurrence risk, suggesting that the assessment of this cytogenetic alteration could represent an easy and quick method to determine which patients could benefit from adjuvant treatment after surgery. In addition, prognostically unfavorable molecular groups can be distinguished using specific immunostainings, although further validation is required.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37921468
OpenAlexW4388302946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.