ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2024
Attention challenges in Kabuki syndrome.
Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurological Complications in Inborn Errors of Immunity: A Scoping Review of Clinical Spectrum, Pathophysiological Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Strategies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the specific neurobehavioural profile of rare genetic diseases enables clinicians to provide the best possible care for patients and families, including prognostic and treatment advisement. Previous studies suggested that a subset of individuals with Kabuki syndrome (KS), a genetic disorder causing intellectual disability and other neurodevelopmental phenotypes, have attentional deficits. However, these studies looked at relatively small numbers of molecularly confirmed cases and often used retrospective clinical data instead of standardised assessments.
methodsFifty-five individuals or caregivers of individuals with molecularly confirmed KS completed assessments to investigate behaviour and adaptive function. Additionally, information was collected on 23 unaffected biological siblings as controls.
resultsAttention Problems in children was the only behavioural category that, when averaged, was clinically significant, with the individual scores of nearly 50% of the children with KS falling in the problematic range. Children with KS scored significantly higher than their unaffected sibling on nearly all behavioural categories. A significant correlation was found between Attention Problems scores and adaptive function scores (P = 0.032), which was not explained by lower general cognitive ability.
conclusionsWe found that the rates of children with attentional deficits are much more elevated than would be expected in the general population, and that attention challenges are negatively correlated with adaptive function. When averaged across KS participants, none of the behavioural categories were in the clinically significant range except Attention Problems for children, which underscores the importance of clinicians screening for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children with KS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.