ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2024
Evidence from Machine Learning, Diagnostic Hub Genes in Sepsis and Diagnostic Models based on Xgboost Models, Novel Molecular Models for the Diagnosis of Sepsis.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The cost of persistent alarm: temporal transcriptional reprogramming of macrophages from acute activation to chronic immune suppression by day 11.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Procalcitonin and interleukin- 6 in predicting prognosis of sepsis patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Harness machine learning for multiple prognoses prediction in sepsis patients: evidence from the MIMIC-IV database.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Power of Mitochondrial Fission and Fusion: A Five- Gene Signature for Personalized Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Transcriptional responses in different mouse models of septic liver injury differ from those in patients with septic liver injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Multi-Omics Analysis Identifies Immune Regulatory Networks in Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury: Experimental Validation and Clinical Relevance.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Development of Novel PANoptosis-Related Gene Signatures to Predict the Prognosis of Patients With Stomach Adenocarcinoma.Human mutation · 2025Article
- Identification of key biomarkers and therapeutic targets in sepsis through coagulation-related gene expression and immune pathway analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystemic multi-organ dysfunction resulting from dysregulated immune responses in the host triggered by microbial infection or other factors is a major cause of death in sepsis, and secretory pathways play an important role in it.
methodsGSE57065, GSE65682, GSE145227, and GSE54514 from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were derived for this study. Secretory pathways single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) scores in sepsis and normal samples were exposed. Gene modules associated with secretory pathways were selected by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) for Protein-Protein Interaction Networks (PPI) assessment, and crossover genes in both were evaluated by eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model in feature selection to identify hub genes in sepsis. In addition, we explored the immune cells and signaling pathways regulated by hub genes.
resultsRemarkable dysregulation of secretory pathways was demonstrated in sepsis. The secretory pathways-associated gene modules were intimately involved in cytokine and immune responses in infection. Four crossover genes (CD163, FCER1G, C3AR1, ARG1) were present in WGCNA and PPI, and training in the XGBoost model revealed the best diagnostic performance of these 4 genes, meaning that these genes were the hub genes for sepsis. The 4-hub genes showed a significant negative correlation with T cell activity and a significant positive correlation with inflammatory immune cells. In addition, we found that the 4-hub genes markedly positively regulated INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE, IL6 JAK STAT3 SIGNALING.
conclusionBased on WGCNA, PPI, and XGBoost models, we identified hub genes that play an important regulatory role in sepsis. We also developed novel molecular models for the diagnosis of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.