Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37921131›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reviews2024

Panniculitis: A Cardinal Sign of Autoinflammation.

Tiago Borges, Sérgio Silva

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tiago BorgesTrofa Saúde Gaia, Rua Fernão de Magalhães nº 2 Fr E, 4404-501 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8271-9865
Sérgio SilvaTrofa Saúde Gaia, Rua Fernão de Magalhães nº 2 Fr E, 4404-501 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7073-1867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Panniculitis was first described in the nineteenth century and is characterized by inflammation of the subcutaneous fat. It may be categorized in septal or lobular subtypes, but other histopathological features (e.g., presence of vasculitis, nature of inflammatory infiltrates, characteristics of fat necrosis) are also important for diagnostic purposes. Clinically, panniculitis is characterized by the presence of subcutaneous nodules, and both ulcerative and nonulcerative clinical subtypes have been proposed. In this review, we aimed to describe the occurrence of panniculitis in autoinflammatory disorders (AIDs) and related diseases. Among monogenic AIDs, panniculitis is common in IFN-mediated disorders. Panniculitis is a distinctive feature in proteasome-associated autoinflammatory syndromes (PRAAS), including chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature (CANDLE) syndrome and Nakajo-Nishimura syndrome. On the other hand, erythema nodosum corresponds to the most common clinical form of panniculitis and is common in polygenic AIDs, such as Behçet's syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and sarcoidosis. Cytophagic histiocytic panniculitis, lipoatrophic panniculitis of children, and otulipenia are rare disorders that may also present with inflammation of the subcutaneous fat. Therefore, panniculitis can identify a specific subgroup of patients with AIDs and may potentially be regarded as a cardinal sign of autoinflammation.

Indexed as

PanniculitisHereditary Autoinflammatory DiseasesHumansInflammationAutoinflammatory diseasesglucocorticoidsinflammasomesinnate immunityinterleukin-1Janus kinase inhibitorspanniculitisproteasome-associated autoinflammatory syndromes.

Identifiers

PMID37921131
OpenAlexW4388302954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.