Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37920864›Full record

ArticleStats2023

Evaluation of Risk Prediction with Hierarchical Data: Dependency Adjusted Confidence Intervals for the AUC.

Camden Bay, Robert J Glynn, Johanna M Seddon, Mei-Ling Ting Lee, Bernard Rosner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stats, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Camden BayHarvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Robert J GlynnHarvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Johanna M SeddonUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Mei-Ling Ting LeeUniversity of Maryland School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Bernard RosnerHarvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

ETIOLOGIC STUDIES OF AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATIONR01EY011309 · NEI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SEDDON, JOHANNA M · 2003 to 2017
$9.3M
Use of Correlated Data Methods in OphthalmologyR01EY022445 · NEI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROSNER, BERNARD A · 2013 to 2025
$4.6M
Rare Genetic Variation in Macular DegenerationR01EY028602 · NEI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SEDDON, JOHANNA M · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
ETIOLOGIC STUDIES OF AGE RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATIONU10EY011309 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI SEDDON, JOHANNA M · 1996 to 2000
$910k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011309NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022445NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028602NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The area under the true ROC curve (AUC) is routinely used to determine how strongly a given model discriminates between the levels of a binary outcome. Standard inference with the AUC requires that outcomes be independent of each other. To overcome this limitation, a method was developed for the estimation of the variance of the AUC in the setting of two-level hierarchical data using probit-transformed prediction scores generated from generalized estimating equation models, thereby allowing for the application of inferential methods. This manuscript presents an extension of this approach so that inference for the AUC may be performed in a three-level hierarchical data setting (e.g., eyes nested within persons and persons nested within families). A method that accounts for the effect of tied prediction scores on inference is also described. The performance of 95% confidence intervals around the AUC was assessed through the simulation of three-level clustered data in multiple settings, including ones with tied data and variable cluster sizes. Across all settings, the actual 95% confidence interval coverage varied from 0.943 to 0.958, and the ratio of the theoretical variance to the empirical variance of the AUC varied from 0.920 to 1.013. The results are better than those from existing methods. Two examples of applying the proposed methodology are presented.

Indexed as

AUCclustered dataconfidence intervalcorrelated datahierarchical models

Identifiers

PMID37920864
PMCPMC10621602
OpenAlexW4366986310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.