Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37920657›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services and drinking water contamination risk levels in households of Bishoftu Town, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Aderajew Mekonnen Girmay, Sisay Derso Mengesha, Daniel A Dinssa, Zinabu Assefa Alemu, Bedasa Wagari, Mesaye G Weldegebriel, Melaku G Serte, Tsigereda A Alemayehu, Moa Abate Kenea, Abel Weldetinsae and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Aderajew Mekonnen GirmayDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-4152
Sisay Derso MengeshaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Daniel A DinssaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Zinabu Assefa AlemuDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Bedasa WagariDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Mesaye G WeldegebrielDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Melaku G SerteDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Tsigereda A AlemayehuDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Moa Abate KeneaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Abel WeldetinsaeDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-2946-6077
Kirubel T TekluDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Ermias Alemayehu AdugnaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-0640-946X
Kaleab S AwokeDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Tesfaye L BedadaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Waktole GobenaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Getnet FikreslassieDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Wendayehu WubeMinistry of Health Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Vivian HoffmannInternational Food Policy Research Institute Washington District of Columbia USA.
Masresha TessemaDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Getachew TolleraDepartment of Nutrition and Environmental Health Research Directorate Ethiopian Public Health Institute Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Ethiopian Public Health Institute · ETInternational Food Policy Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Access to safe drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene is a fundamental human right and essential to control infectious diseases. However, many countries, including Ethiopia, do not have adequate data to report on basic water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services. Although contaminated drinking water spreads diseases like cholera, diarrhea, typhoid, and dysentery, studies on drinking water contamination risk levels in households are limited in Ethiopia. Therefore, closing this gap needs investigation. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 5350 households were included. A systematic, simple random sampling technique was used to select the participants. The information was gathered through in-person interviews using a standardized questionnaire. Furthermore, 1070 drinking water samples were collected from household water storage. Results: This investigation revealed that 9.8%, 83.9%, and 4.9% of households used limited, basic, and safely managed drinking water services, respectively. Besides, 10.2%, 15.7% and 59.3% of households used safely managed, basic and limited sanitation services, respectively. Yet, 10.6% and 4.2% of households used unimproved sanitation facilities and open defecation practices. Also, 40.5% and 19.4% of households used limited and basic hygiene services. On the other hand, 40.1% of households lacked functional handwashing facilities. In this study, 12.1%, 26.3%, and 42% of households' drinking water samples were positive for Conclusion: The majority of households in Bishoftu town lack access to safely managed sanitation, drinking water, and basic hygiene services. Many households' water samples had very high and high health risk levels. Hence, the government and partner organizations should implement water and sanitation safety plans.

Indexed as

accesscontamination risk levelhygienesanitationWASHwater

Identifiers

PMID37920657
PMCPMC10618431
OpenAlexW4388137472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.