Nineteen-Month Immunity to Adverse Radiation Effects Following 5-Fraction Re-radiosurgery With 43.6 Gy for Local Progression After Prior 3-Fraction Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis From Pan-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. High incidence of radiation-induced brain necrosis in the periventricular deep white matter: stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
   Article
2. Fifteen-Fraction Radiosurgery Followed by Reduced-Dose Whole-Brain Irradiation With a Total Biologically Effective Dose of >90-100 Gy for a Locally Invasive Brain Metastasis From Lung Adenocarcinoma With a High Dissemination Potential.Cureus · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as