Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37920643›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

SIR Flat CAP (Safety In Radiology - Flat-Packed Compact Airborne Precaution): A Low-Cost, Portable, Negative-Pressure Isolation Barrier Shield for Protecting Frontline Healthcare Workers.

Shao J Ong, Ian Renfrew, Deborah X Khoo, Denise A Choong, Hui L Koh, Deborah S Ng, Lycia Teo, Joseph K Lee, Linda Yuen, Koon Liang Chia and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 64% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Shao J OngRadiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SGP.
Ian RenfrewInterventional Radiology, Royal London Hospital, London, GBR.
Deborah X KhooAnesthesia, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Denise A ChoongRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Hui L KohRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Deborah S NgRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Lycia TeoPsychiatry, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Joseph K LeeRadiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Linda YuenRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Koon Liang ChiaRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Priscilla X ChenRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Yi Ming TeoRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Bertrand AngRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Swee Tian QuekRadiology, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Multiple barrier shields have been described since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of these are bulky and designed for use in the main anesthetic or radiology departments. We developed a portable, negative-pressure barrier shield designed specifically for portable ultrasound examinations. A novel supine cough generation model was developed together with a reverse qualitative fit test to simulate real-world aerosol droplet generation and dispersion for evaluating the effectiveness of the barrier shield. We report the technical specifications of this design, named "SIR Flat CAP" from Safety In Radiology - Flat-packed Compact Airborne Precaution, as well as its performance in reducing the spread of droplets and aerosols.  Methods The barrier shield was constructed using 1 mm acrylic panels, clear packing tape, foam double-sided tape, and surgical drapes. Negative pressure was provided via hospital wall suction. A supine cough generation model was developed to simulate cough droplet dispersal. A reverse qualitative fit test was used to assess for airborne transmission of microdroplets. Results The supine cough generation model was able to replicate similar results to previously reported supine human cough generation dispersion. The use of the barrier shield with negative-pressure suction prevented the escape of visible droplets, and no airborne microdroplets were detected by reverse qualitative fit testing from the containment area. Conclusions The barrier shield significantly reduces the escape of visible and airborne droplets from the containment area, providing an additional layer of protection to front-line sonographers.

Indexed as

aerosol-generating proceduresbarrier shieldcovid-19negative pressure barrier shieldportable barrier shieldqualitative fit testingradiology safetysupine cough generation modelultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37920643
PMCPMC10618713
OpenAlexW4387264260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.