Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37920549›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2023

Online conspiracy communities are more resilient to deplatforming.

Corrado Monti, Matteo Cinelli, Carlo Valensise, Walter Quattrociocchi, Michele Starnini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Corrado MontiCENTAI Institute, Corso Inghilterra 3, Torino (TO) 10138, Italy.
Matteo CinelliDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 295, Roma (RM) 00161, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3899-4592
Carlo ValensiseCentro Ricerche Enrico Fermi, Piazza del Viminale 1, Roma (RM) 00184, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3207-3119
Walter QuattrociocchiDepartment of Computer Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 295, Roma (RM) 00161, Italy.
Michele StarniniCENTAI Institute, Corso Inghilterra 3, Torino (TO) 10138, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9161-5339
Sapienza University of Rome · ITCentro Ricerche Enrico Fermi · ITUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online social media foster the creation of active communities around shared narratives. Such communities may turn into incubators for conspiracy theories-some spreading violent messages that could sharpen the debate and potentially harm society. To face these phenomena, most social media platforms implemented moderation policies, ranging from posting warning labels up to deplatforming, i.e. permanently banning users. Assessing the effectiveness of content moderation is crucial for balancing societal safety while preserving the right to free speech. In this article, we compare the shift in behavior of users affected by the ban of two large communities on Reddit,

Indexed as

content moderationdeplatformingsocial mediasocial networks

Identifiers

PMID37920549
PMCPMC10619511
OpenAlexW4388123186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.