Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37920532›Full record

ArticleJournal of machine learning research : JMLR2021

Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization.

Wei Wang, Matthew Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of machine learning research : JMLR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Gene-Program Architecture of Mouse T cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Empirical Bayes Covariance Decomposition, and a Solution to the Multiple Tuning Problem in Sparse PCA.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. fSuSiE enables fine-mapping of QTLs from genome-scale molecular profiles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Covariate-moderated Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Bayesian lens and Bayesian blinkers.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei WangDepartment of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Matthew StephensDepartment of Statistics and Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Genome analysis: statistical methods and applicationsR01HG002585 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MATTHEW STEPHENS · 2002 to 2026
$8.4M
Genome analysis: statistical methods and applicationsR56HG002585 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI STEPHENS, MATTHEW · 2023 to 2023
$292k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002585NHGRI NIH HHS R56 HG002585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matrix factorization methods, which include Factor analysis (FA) and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), are widely used for inferring and summarizing structure in multivariate data. Many such methods use a penalty or prior distribution to achieve sparse representations ("Sparse FA/PCA"), and a key question is how much sparsity to induce. Here we introduce a general Empirical Bayes approach to matrix factorization (EBMF), whose key feature is that it estimates the appropriate amount of sparsity by estimating prior distributions from the observed data. The approach is very flexible: it allows for a wide range of different prior families and allows that each component of the matrix factorization may exhibit a different amount of sparsity. The key to this flexibility is the use of a variational approximation, which we show effectively reduces fitting the EBMF model to solving a simpler problem, the so-called "normal means" problem. We demonstrate the benefits of EBMF with sparse priors through both numerical comparisons with competing methods and through analysis of data from the GTEx (Genotype Tissue Expression) project on genetic associations across 44 human tissues. In numerical comparisons EBMF often provides more accurate inferences than other methods. In the GTEx data, EBMF identifies interpretable structure that agrees with known relationships among human tissues. Software implementing our approach is available at https://github.com/stephenslab/flashr.

Indexed as

empirical Bayesmatrix factorizationnormal meanssparse priorunimodal priorvariational approximation

Identifiers

PMID37920532
PMCPMC10621241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.