Trial reportF1000Research2023
The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in F1000Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07294378 (Evaluation of the Dental Changes Associated With the Traction of Palatally Impacted Canines Using the Conventional Versus the Corticotomy-assisted Method), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Dental Changes Associated With the Traction of Palatally Impacted Canines Using the Conventional Versus the Corticotomy-assisted Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic, predictive, and therapeutic approaches for impacted canines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating the success rates and effectiveness of surgical and orthodontic interventions for impacted canines: a systematic review of surgical and orthodontic interventions and a case series.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of single versus multiple piezocisions on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Treatment Options in Impacted Maxillary Canines: A Literature Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of Corticotomy and Piezocision on Canine Retraction: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Canine conundrum: Deciphering the factors at play - A systematic review.Journal of orthodontic science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.