ReviewCureus2023
Duct-to-Duct Anastomosis Versus Bilioenteric Anastomosis for Pediatrics Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and feasibility of duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis in pediatric liver transplantation: A single-center retrospective study.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With an incidence exceeding 30%, biliary complications after pediatric liver transplantation remain a great challenge. In addition, the database includes numerous controversial papers about the safety of duct-to-duct anastomosis compared to Reux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We aim to compare the two techniques in pediatric LDLT by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. PUBMED, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies from 1989 to October 2022. According to our eligibility criteria, seven articles (561 pediatric LDLT) were included in our study. On one hand, DD anastomosis is associated with a higher rate of biliary stricture in comparison to RYHJ (OR: 2.47, 95% CI = 1.20-5.09, P = 0.01; I2 = 12%). On the other hand, the incidence of cholangitis was higher in RYHJ (OR: 0.10 95% CI = 0.01- 0.84, P = 0.03; I2 = 0%). However, there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of complications, leakage and mortality between the two groups (overall incidence of complication OR: 1.12, 95% CI = 0.34-3.68, P = 0.86; I2 = 62%), (Leakage OR: 2.22, 95% CI = 0.79-6.23, P = 0.13; I2 = 18%) and (Mortality OR: 2.53, 95% CI = 0.61-10.57, P = 0.30; I2 = 0%). In conclusion, with a lower incidence of cholangitis, an equal overall incidence of biliary complication, and the possibility of RY conversion in case of stricture, DD anastomosis offers a feasible, safe, and more physiological alternative to RYHJ for pediatric LDLT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.