ArticleOphthalmology science2023
Assessing the Impact of Image Quality on Deep Learning Classification of Infectious Keratitis.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leakage-Aware Visit-Level Benchmarking Reveals Representational Overlap in Deep Learning for Bacterial Versus Fungal Keratitis Classification.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Classification of Slit-Lamp Photograph Quality in Microbial Keratitis.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Application in Cornea and External Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in corneal diseases: A narrative review.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2024Review
- Application of Deep Learning Algorithms Based on the Multilayer Y0L0v8 Neural Network to Identify Fungal Keratitis.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Article
- Applications of Computer Vision for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology scienceReview
- Multimodal Deep Learning for Differentiating Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Prospective Representative Data.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of corneal photograph quality on convolutional neural network (CNN) predictions. Design: A CNN trained to classify bacterial and fungal keratitis was evaluated using photographs of ulcers labeled according to 5 corneal image quality parameters: eccentric gaze direction, abnormal eyelid position, over/under-exposure, inadequate focus, and malpositioned light reflection. Participants: All eligible subjects with culture and stain-proven bacterial and/or fungal ulcers presenting to Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India, between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. Methods: Convolutional neural network classification performance was compared for each quality parameter, and gradient class activation heatmaps were generated to visualize regions of highest influence on CNN predictions. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic and precision recall curves were calculated to quantify model performance. Bootstrapped confidence intervals were used for statistical comparisons. Logistic loss was calculated to measure individual prediction accuracy. Results: Individual presence of either light reflection or eyelids obscuring the corneal surface was associated with significantly higher CNN performance. No other quality parameter significantly influenced CNN performance. Qualitative review of gradient class activation heatmaps generally revealed the infiltrate as having the highest diagnostic relevance. Conclusions: The CNN demonstrated expert-level performance regardless of image quality. Future studies may investigate use of smartphone cameras and image sets with greater variance in image quality to further explore the influence of these parameters on model performance. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.