Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37920420›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2023

A Deep Learning Approach for Meibomian Gland Appearance Evaluation.

Kasandra Swiderska, Caroline A Blackie, Carole Maldonado-Codina, Philip B Morgan, Michael L Read, Martin Fergie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Internal validation of a convolutional neural network pipeline for assessing meibomian gland structure from meibography.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kasandra SwiderskaEurolens Research, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Caroline A BlackieJohnson & Johnson Vision, Inc, Jacksonville, Florida.
Carole Maldonado-CodinaEurolens Research, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Philip B MorganEurolens Research, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Michael L ReadEurolens Research, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Martin FergieDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GBJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and evaluate a deep learning algorithm for Meibomian gland characteristics calculation. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic technology. Subjects: A total of 1616 meibography images of both the upper (697) and lower (919) eyelids from a total of 282 individuals. Methods: Images were collected using the LipiView II device. All the provided data were split into 3 sets: the training, validation, and test sets. Data partitions used proportions of 70/10/20% and included data from 2 optometry settings. Each set was separately partitioned with these proportions, resulting in a balanced distribution of data from both settings. The images were divided based on patient identifiers, such that all images collected for one participant could end up only in one set. The labeled images were used to train a deep learning model, which was subsequently used for Meibomian gland segmentation. The model was then applied to calculate individual Meibomian gland metrics. Interreader agreement and agreement between manual and automated methods for Meibomian gland segmentation were also carried out to assess the accuracy of the automated approach. Main Outcome Measures: Meibomian gland metrics, including length ratio, area, tortuosity, intensity, and width, were measured. Additionally, the performance of the automated algorithms was evaluated using the aggregated Jaccard index. Results: The proposed semantic segmentation-based approach achieved average aggregated Jaccard index of mean 0.4718 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4680-0.4771) for the 'gland' class and a mean of 0.8470 (95% CI, 0.8432-0.8508) for the 'eyelid' class. The result for object detection-based approach was a mean of 0.4476 (95% CI, 0.4426-0.4533). Both artificial intelligence-based algorithms underestimated area, length ratio, tortuosity, width Conclusions: The proposed approach can successfully segment Meibomian glands; however, to overcome problems with gland overlap and lack of image sharpness, the proposed method requires further development. The study presents another approach to utilizing automated, artificial intelligence-based methods in Meibomian gland health assessment that may assist clinicians in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of Meibomian gland dysfunction. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningImage processingMeibographyMeibomian gland imagingMeibomian glandsMeibomian gland structure

Identifiers

PMID37920420
PMCPMC10618829
OpenAlexW4377232068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.