ArticleOphthalmology science2023
Detailed Evaluation of Chromatic Pupillometry and Full-Field Stimulus Testing to Assess Ultralow Vision in Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- ISCEV and IPS guideline for the full-field stimulus test (FST).Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2024Guideline
- The role of full-field stimulus threshold in evaluating Bietti crystalline dystrophy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Observational
- Base and Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Delivery Platforms, Safety, Efficacy, and Translational Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Relationship between residual visual field and full-field stimulus testing in patients with late-stage retinal degenerative diseases.Scientific reports · 2024Review
- Chromatic pupillometry isolation and evaluation of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupillary light response in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Novel therapeutic options, such as regenerative medicine and gene therapy, are now emerging as viable treatment options for patients with severe visual impairments, such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Gradable assessment of patients' visual function is essential to consider treatment options and to evaluate treatment outcomes; however, evaluation of visual function in patients with advanced low vision is often challenging because of patients' poor and sometimes unpredictable responses. In this study, we attempted to accurately assess visual capabilities and disease stage in patients with RP with a visual acuity (VA) of ≤ 0.01. Design: Retrospective analysis of visual function indicators, including VA, retinal thickness, full-field stimulus testing (FST), and chromatic pupillometry. Subjects: Overall, 43 patients (84 eyes) with advanced RP with a VA of ≤ 0.01 visited Kobe City Eye Hospital from 2019 to 2021. Methods: Hierarchical (multilevel) Bayesian modeling was used to estimate individual eye's pupil response and FST threshold, taking into account the ambiguity and randomness often observed in patients with ultralow vision. Using the estimated ability obtained from each test, the correlation between each test and retinal thickness was further analyzed to make a comprehensive assessment of the data. Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity, retinal thickness, FST threshold, and pupil diameter change to different light stimuli. Results: Full-field stimulus testing and pupillometry measurements were moderately correlated with VA but exhibited a wide range of values within the same VA groups. Full-field stimulus testing was not correlated with central retinal thickness at counting fingers/hand motion VA range and seemed to reflect overall remaining photoreceptor function, including peripheral retina. Pupillometry may be able to distinguish between different levels of inner retinal function. Conclusions: The combination of pupillometry and FST allowed for graded evaluation of visual function within patients grouped in the same VA groups in patients with advanced RP with ultralow vision. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.