ArticleJPRAS open2023
Is there any gender-specific impact in the treatment of patients with basal cell carcinoma in the head and neck region?
Article in JPRAS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are no current studies concerning gender-specific impact on the treatment of BCCs. We performed a retrospective analysis with the aim of showing that selection of treatment by physician and patients' evaluation concerning quality of life and aesthetic outcome has a gender-specific impact. Methods: Overall, 47 patients treated by excision of BCC from the head and neck region at our department from 2015 to 2020 were included. Defects were closed via flap, split-thickness skin graft. or primary closure. Pain, scar quality, patient satisfaction and quality of life were ascertained by the Skin Cancer Index (SCI), the Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Quality of Life (BaSQoL) questionnaire, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSASv2.0EN) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Results: Women received significantly more flaps than split-thickness skin grafts ( Conclusion: We determined the gender-specific impacts on the treatment of patients with BCCs regarding methods of closure, post-interventional dermatological follow-ups, quality of life, scar quality, and overall patient satisfaction. No difference in scar quality was found when assessed by physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.