Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37920101›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

Investigating the association between characteristics of local crisis care systems and service use in an English national survey.

Antonio Rojas-García, Christian Dalton-Locke, Luke Sheridan Rains, Ceri Dare, Cedric Ginestet, Una Foye, Kathleen Kelly, Sabine Landau, Chris Lynch, Paul McCrone and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Antonio Rojas-GarcíaNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; and Department of Psychiatry, University of Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-4311
Christian Dalton-LockeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-4741
Luke Sheridan RainsNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Ceri DareNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Cedric GinestetDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Una FoyeNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Kathleen KellyOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Sabine LandauNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Chris LynchNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Paul McCroneNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7001-4502
Shilpa NairiCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Karen NewbiggingDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Patrick NyikavarandaNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; and Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.
David OsbornDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Granada, Spain; and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2519-1539
Karen PersaudNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and NUS Centre for Behavioural & Implementation Science Interventions, Singapore.
Martin StefanMental Health Addictions and Intellectual Disability Directorate, Te Whatu Ora (Southern), Dunedin, New Zealand.
Ruth StuartNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9764-3840
Alan SimpsonNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Sonia JohnsonNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-788X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn England, a range of mental health crisis care models and approaches to organising crisis care systems have been implemented, but characteristics associated with their effectiveness are poorly understood.

aimsTo (a) develop a typology of catchment area mental health crisis care systems and (b) investigate how crisis care service models and system characteristics relate to psychiatric hospital admissions and detentions.

methodCrisis systems data were obtained from a 2019 English national survey. Latent class analyses were conducted to identify discernible typologies, and mixed-effects negative binomial regression models were fitted to explore associations between crisis care models and admissions and detention rates, obtained from nationally reported data.

resultsNo clear typology of catchment area crisis care systems emerged. Regression models suggested that provision of a crisis telephone service within the local crisis system was associated with a 11.6% lower admissions rate and 15.3% lower detention rate. Provision of a crisis cafe was associated with a 7.8% lower admission rates. The provision of a crisis assessment team separate from the crisis resolution and home treatment service was associated with a 12.8% higher admission rate.

conclusionsThe configuration of crisis care systems varies considerably in England, but we could not derive a typology that convincingly categorised crisis care systems. Our results suggest that a crisis phone line and a crisis cafe may be associated with lower admission rates. However, our findings suggest crisis assessment teams, separate from home treatment teams, may not be associated with reductions in admission and detentions.

Indexed as

crisis care models and systemsEnglandMental health servicespsychiatric admissionspsychiatric detentions

Identifiers

PMID37920101
PMCPMC10753954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.