Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37919769›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2023

Overcoming the challenges facing Nepal's health system during federalisation: an analysis of health system building blocks.

Sharada Prasad Wasti, Edwin van Teijlingen, Simon Rushton, Madhusudan Subedi, Padam Simkhada, Julie Balen, Nepal Federal Health System Team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
27.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharada Prasad WastiSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom. s.p.wasti@hud.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8833-7801
Edwin van TeijlingenCMWH, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-8583
Simon RushtonDepartment of Politics and International Relations, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-9871
Madhusudan SubediSchool of Public Health, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-0601
Padam SimkhadaSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-6479
Julie BalenManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4736-8465
Nepal Federal Health System Team
University of Huddersfield · GBCanterbury Christ Church University · GBBournemouth University · GBManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences · NPPatan Academy of Health Sciences · NP

Funding

Medical Research Centre MR/T023554/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNepal's move to a federal system was a major constitutional and political change, with significant devolution of power and resources from the central government to seven newly created provinces and 753 local governments. Nepal's health system is in the process of adapting to federalism, which is a challenging, yet potentially rewarding, task. This research is a part of broader study that aims to explore the opportunities and challenges facing Nepal's health system as it adapts to federalisation.

methodsThis exploratory qualitative study was conducted across the three tiers of government (federal, provincial, and local) in Nepal. We employed two methods: key informant interviews and participatory policy analysis workshops, to offer an in-depth understanding of stakeholders' practical learnings, experiences, and opinions. Participants included policymakers, health service providers, local elected members, and other local stakeholders. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and analysed thematically using the six WHO (World Health Organization) health system building blocks as a theoretical framework.

resultsParticipants noted both opportunities and challenges around each building block. Identified opportunities were: (a) tailored local health policies and plans, (b) improved health governance at the municipality level, (c) improved health infrastructure and service capacity, (d) improved outreach services, (e) increased resources (health budgets, staffing, and supplies), and (f) improved real-time data reporting from health facilities. At the same time, several challenges were identified including: (a) poor coordination between the tiers of government, (b) delayed release of funds, (c) maldistribution of staff, (d) problems over procurement, and (e) limited monitoring and supervision of the quality of service delivery and data reporting.

conclusionOur findings suggest that since federalisation, Nepal's health system performance is improving, although much remains to be accomplished. For Nepal to succeed in its federalisation process, understanding the challenges and opportunities is vital to improving each level of the health system in terms of (a) leadership and governance, (b) service delivery, (c) health financing, (d) health workforce, (e) access to essential medicines and technologies and (f) health information system.

Indexed as

Government ProgramsHealth PolicyHumansNepalPolicy MakingQualitative ResearchFederalismHealth systemNepalQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37919769
PMCPMC10621174
OpenAlexW4388232123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.