ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2023
The Field's mass shooting: emergency medical services response.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-border collaboration in a major incident: emergency medical services response to a train crash.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The role of tactical police medics in the prehospital environment: results from an interview study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- European perspectives on pre-hospital interagency collaboration during terrorist incidents: a focus group study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Concrete silo collapse: emergency medical services response to a mass casualty incident.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Tactical Emergency Medical Services in Copenhagen, Denmark: A mixed methods design study introducing a new concept.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Existing Data Sources in Clinical Epidemiology: The Danish Prehospital Medical Record System.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Review
- Perceived competency requirements for emergency medical services field supervisors in managing chemical and explosive incidents - qualitative interview study.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Application of quality indicators and critical lessons learned assessment as a research approach for the evaluation of rescue missions during terrorist attacks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Key issues in Japan's public health centers to prepare for future pandemics: a text mining study using a topic model.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMajor incidents (MI) happen infrequently in Scandinavia and mass shootings are even less frequently occurring. Case reports and research are called for, as literature is scarce. On 3rd July 2022, a mass shooting took place at the shopping mall Field's in Copenhagen, Denmark. Three people were killed and seven injured by a gunman, firing a rifle inside the mall. A further 21 people suffered minor injuries during the evacuation of the mall. In this case report, we describe the emergency medical services (EMS) incident response and evaluate the EMS´ adherence to the MI management guidelines to identify possible areas of improvement. CASE PRESENTATION: Forty-eight EMS units including five Tactical Emergency Medical Service teams were dispatched to the incident. Four critically injured patients were taken to two trauma hospitals. The deceased patients were declared dead at the scene and remained there for the sake of the investigation. A total of 24 patients with less severe and minor injuries were treated at four different hospitals in connection with the attack. The ambulance resources were inherently limited in the initial phase of the MI, mandating improvisation in medical incident command. Though challenged, Command and Control, Safety, Communication, Assessment, Triage, Treatment, Transport (CSCATTT) principles were followed.
conclusionsThe EMS response generally adhered to national guidelines for MI. The activation of EMS and the hospital preparedness program was relevant. Important findings were communication shortcomings; inherent lack of readily available ambulance resources in the initial critical phase; uncertainty regarding the number of perpetrators; uncertainty regarding number of casualties and social media rumors that unnecessarily hampered and prolonged the response. The incident command had to use non-standard measures to mitigate potential challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.