Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37919385›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Cardiac telerehabilitation under 5G internet of things monitoring: a randomized pilot study.

Xiaojie Li, Lvheng Zhao, Tao Xu, Guofeng Shi, Jie Li, Wei Shuai, Yanqun Yang, Yang Yang, Weiyi Tian, Yixia Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojie Li *Nursing School, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Lvheng Zhao *Nursing School, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Tao Xu *Department of Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Guofeng Shi *Nursing School, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Jie LiNursing School, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Wei ShuaiSecond Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Yanqun YangDepartment of Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Weiyi TianGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China. tianweiyi@gzy.edu.cn.
Yixia ZhouNursing School, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China. zhouyixia2014@126.com.
Guizhou University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to issues such as time and cost, patients often show poor acceptance of and adherence to center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR), which impacts the effectiveness of rehabilitation. Therefore, there is growing interest in home-based cardiac rehabilitation and cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR), which entail less time and cost than CBCR. This study aimed to compare the changes in physiological and psychological indicators, compliance, and satisfaction after CTR and CBCR. In this single-blind, randomized, controlled trial, the intervention group received CTR via the 5G Internet of Things platform, while the control group received CBCR. Data from 50 patients (age 66.28 ± 4.01 years) with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed. After an intervention period of three months, the maximal oxygen uptake and metabolic equivalent of task were 5.53 ± 0.12 and 19.32 ± 0.17, respectively, in the intervention group, and 4.15 ± 0.13 and 16.52 ± 0.18, respectively, in the control group. After three months of intervention, there were significant differences between the two groups in all observed indicators (p < 0.05), except for low-density lipoprotein and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (p > 0.05). The use of a 5G Internet of Things platform cardiac rehabilitation model effectively improved outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Trials registry: The study protocol was registered at Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR), first trial registration 07/08/2023, identification number ChiCTR2300074435.

Indexed as

Internet of ThingsMyocardial InfarctionTelerehabilitationAgedHumansInternetMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID37919385
PMCPMC10622509
OpenAlexW4388232556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.