Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918956›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2023

Time to extend the indication for sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer? Results from a prospective nationwide Swedish study.

Diana Zach, Katja Stenström Bohlin, Paivi Kannisto, Louise Moberg, Preben Kjölhede

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04147780 (Can the Investigators Extend the Indication for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Vulvar Cancer? A Nationwide Feasibility Study From Sweden), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04147780 completednot on this map

Can the Investigators Extend the Indication for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Vulvar Cancer? A Nationwide Feasibility Study From Sweden

TypeobservationalSponsorDiana ZachRan2019 to 2023Enrolled64ConditionsVulva Cancer, Sentinel Lymph NodeArmsSentinel node biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Diana ZachDivision for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden diana.zach@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-5951
Katja Stenström BohlinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.
Paivi KannistoObstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Skåne, Sweden.
Louise MobergObstetrics and Gynecology, Skånes Universitetssjukhus Lund, Lund, Skåne, Sweden.
Preben KjölhedeObstetrics and Gynecology, Linkopings Universitet Institutionen for Klinisk och Experimentell Medicin, Linkoping, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SELinköping University · SELund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess detection rates and negative predictive values of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with tumors ≥4 cm, multifocal tumors, and in locally recurrent disease.

methodsBetween December 2019 and December 2022, patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with tumors ≥4 cm (group 1), multifocal tumors (group 2), or a first local recurrence without or with previous groin treatment (groups 3 and 4, respectively) were included in a prospective, nationwide multicenter interventional pilot study. The participants underwent a sentinel node biopsy followed by inguinofemoral lymph node dissection. Detection rates, negative predictive values, the proportion of micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells were determined separately for each group.

resultsIn all, 64 women were included, 36 women in group 1 (56%), and 17 women in group 2 (27%). Due to the small number and heterogeneity of the 11 women in groups 3 and 4, they were excluded from further analyses. In groups 1 and 2, 25 women (47%) were diagnosed with node-positive disease, and in 16 women (64%) only in the sentinel nodes. The detection rates varied between 94.1-100% per patient and 84.1-85.3% per groin. No false-negative sentinel nodes were identified, giving a negative predictive value of 100% for group 1 (95% CI 91.2% to 100%) and for group 2 (95% CI 83.9% to 100%). Of the node-positive patients, 32% had micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells only. One third of the metastases were detected by ultrastaging. In 27% of the non-mapping groins, metastases were found in the lymphadenectomy specimen, and in 75% the metastases showed extranodal growth.

conclusionIn this small cohort of patients, we provide further data that may widen the indication of the sentinel node technique to women with tumors ≥4 cm and multifocal tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04147780.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellVulvar NeoplasmsFemaleGroinHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySwedensentinel lymph nodevulvar and vaginal cancervulvar neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37918956
PMCPMC10803969
OpenAlexW4388216714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.