ArticleBMJ open2023
Latent profile analysis of nurses' perceived professional benefits in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of organizational atmosphere on current and future professional benefits among staff nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Work-related well-being among hepatobiliary surgical nurses: a structural equation modeling study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Burnout and anxiety among Chinese nurses: the mediating roles of positive coping strategies and interpersonal relationship problems: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Professional benefits perception among pediatric nurses: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- The relationship between psychological capital, burnout and perceived stress in junior nurses: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional Study Reveals Moderate Professional Benefits Among Nurses in a Multicultural Healthcare System.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify profiles of nurses' perceived professional benefits as well as their predictors.
designCross-sectional study.
settingThe study was carried out online in China.
methodsFrom 6 July to 27 July 2022, a total of 1309 registered nurses participated in the survey by convenient sampling. We collected the Nurses' Perceived Professional Benefits Questionnaire and demographic data. Using latent profile analysis (LPA), subgroups of nurses' perceived professional benefits were identified. Moreover, univariate and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to find the factors that were linked with the profiles.
resultsThe survey was validly completed by 1309 nurses, with a 92.9% effective return rate. The findings of the LPA demonstrated three unique profiles: low-perceived professional benefits (11.8%), moderate-perceived professional benefits (57.1%) and high-perceived professional benefits (31.1%). There was a correlation between marital status, the number of night shifts per month and leadership role.
conclusionsAccording to our research, registered nurses have three unique professional benefit profiles. In order to sustain the nursing workforce, despite the fact that nurses get a high level of professional benefits, interventions are necessary to increase nurses' perception of their professional value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.