Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918925›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Interventions to reduce interpersonal stigma towards patients with a mental dysregulation for ambulance and emergency department healthcare professionals: review protocol for an integrative review.

Geurt Van de Glind, Niek Galenkamp, Nienke Bleijenberg, Lisette Schoonhoven, Floortje E Scheepers, Julia Crilly, Mark van Veen, Wietske H W Ham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Geurt Van de GlindInstitute of Nursing Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands geurt.vandeglind@hu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8647-6581
Niek GalenkampInstitute of Nursing Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nienke BleijenbergInstitute of Nursing Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lisette SchoonhovenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Floortje E ScheepersBrain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Julia CrillySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Mark van VeenInstitute of Nursing Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wietske H W HamInstitute of Nursing Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorldwide, there is an increase in the extent and severity of mental illness. Exacerbation of somatic complaints in this group of people can result in recurring ambulance and emergency department care. The care of patients with a mental dysregulation (ie, experiencing a mental health problem and disproportionate feelings like fear, anger, sadness or confusion, possibly with associated behaviours) can be complex and challenging in the emergency care context, possibly evoking a wide variety of feelings, ranging from worry or pity to annoyance and frustration in emergency care staff members. This in return may lead to stigma towards patients with a mental dysregulation seeking emergency care. Interventions have been developed impacting attitude and behaviour and minimising stigma held by healthcare professionals. However, these interventions are not explicitly aimed at the emergency care context nor do these represent perspectives of healthcare professionals working within this context. Therefore, the aim of the proposed review is to gain insight into interventions targeting healthcare professionals, which minimise stigma including beliefs, attitudes and behaviour towards patients with a mental dysregulation within the emergency care context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol for a systematic integrative review is presented, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols recommendations. A systematic search was performed on 13 July 2023. Study selection and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. In each step, an expert with lived experience will comment on process and results. Software applications RefWorks-ProQuest, Rayyan and ATLAS.ti will be used to enhance the quality of the review and transparency of process and results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval or safety considerations are required for this review. The proposed review will be submitted to a relevant international journal. Results will be presented at relevant medical scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023390664 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Indexed as

AmbulancesAttitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicReview Literature as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEMENTAL HEALTHPSYCHIATRY

Identifiers

PMID37918925
PMCPMC10626855
OpenAlexW4388217191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.