Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918923›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Evaluation of variation in special educational needs provision and its impact on health and education using administrative records for England: umbrella protocol for a mixed-methods research programme.

Ania Zylbersztejn, Kate Lewis, Vincent Nguyen, Jacob Matthews, Isaac Winterburn, Lucy Karwatowska, Sarah Barnes, Matthew Lilliman, Jennifer Saxton, Antony Stone and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ania ZylbersztejnUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1035-1448
Kate LewisUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Vincent NguyenUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Jacob MatthewsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Isaac WinterburnDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lucy KarwatowskaUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-5190
Sarah BarnesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew LillimanUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Jennifer SaxtonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Antony StoneUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Kate BoddyDepartment of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9135-5488
Johnny DownsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8061-295X
Stuart LoganThe Peninsula Childhood Disability Research Unit, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Jugnoo RahiUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Kristine Black-HawkinsFaculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lorraine DeardenUCL Social Research Institute, UCL, London, UK.
Tamsin FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-4904
Katie HarronUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-2856
Bianca De StavolaUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Ruth GilbertUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK r.gilbert@ucl.ac.uk.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBKing's College London · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR202025Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne-third of children in England have special educational needs (SEN) provision recorded during their school career. The proportion of children with SEN provision varies between schools and demographic groups, which may reflect variation in need, inequitable provision and/or systemic factors. There is scant evidence on whether SEN provision improves health and education outcomes.

methodsThe Health Outcomes of young People in Education (HOPE) research programme uses administrative data from the Education and Child Health Insights from Linked Data-ECHILD-which contains data from all state schools, and contacts with National Health Service hospitals in England, to explore variation in SEN provision and its impact on health and education outcomes. This umbrella protocol sets out analyses across four work packages (WP). WP1 defined a range of 'health phenotypes', that is health conditions expected to need SEN provision in primary school. Next, we describe health and education outcomes (WP1) and individual, school-level and area-level factors affecting variation in SEN provision across different phenotypes (WP2). WP3 assesses the impact of SEN provision on health and education outcomes for specific health phenotypes using a range of causal inference methods to account for confounding factors and possible selection bias. In WP4 we review local policies and synthesise findings from surveys, interviews and focus groups of service users and providers to understand factors associated with variation in and experiences of identification, assessment and provision for SEN. Triangulation of findings on outcomes, variation and impact of SEN provision for different health phenotypes in ECHILD, with experiences of SEN provision will inform interpretation of findings for policy, practice and families and methods for future evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics committees have approved the use of the ECHILD database and, separately, the survey, interviews and focus groups of young people, parents and service providers. These stakeholders will contribute to the design, interpretation and communication of findings.

Indexed as

SchoolsState MedicineAdolescentCommunicationEducational StatusHumansParentsReview Literature as Topicepidemiologyhealth equityhealth informaticspublic healthqualitative researchstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID37918923
PMCPMC10626865
OpenAlexW4388275946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.