Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918912›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2024

Atretic cephalocele and differential considerations: A small case series.

Hallie Whalen, Sandrine Yazbek

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hallie WhalenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroradiology Section, University of Maryland Medical Center, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3299-5052
Sandrine YazbekDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroradiology Section, University of Maryland Medical Center, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5557-7371
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Any posterior midline cystic or soft tissue scalp mass in an infant needs evaluation with MRI brain and MRV brain to look for intracranial extension of the lesion. One of the differential considerations is an atretic cephalocele, which can be a difficult diagnosis, especially when the cystic lesions are small. The presence of a small calvarial defect adjacent to the cystic mass and a persistent primitive falcine vein, which points towards the cystic mass, are imaging clues to this diagnosis. Correct diagnosis is needed prior to surgical resection to avoid potentially serious postoperative complications.

Indexed as

EncephaloceleMagnetic Resonance ImagingDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleAtretic cephaloceleencephalocelefalcine veinsinus pericranii

Identifiers

PMID37918912
PMCPMC11366204
OpenAlexW4388248381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.