Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918909›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2024

Brain edema growth after thrombectomy is associated with comprehensive collateral blood flow.

Tobias D Faizy, Laurens Winkelmeier, Michael Mlynash, Gabriel Broocks, Christian Heitkamp, Christian Thaler, Noel van Horn, Pierre Seners, Helge Kniep, Paul Stracke and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Tobias D FaizyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany t.faizy@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1631-2020
Laurens WinkelmeierDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9103-5983
Michael MlynashDepartment of Neurology, Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Gabriel BroocksDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7575-9850
Christian HeitkampDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8988-0918
Christian ThalerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-9316
Noel van HornDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5764-1982
Pierre SenersNeurology, Fondation Rothschild, Paris, France.
Helge KniepDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-2370
Paul StrackeSection of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munster, Munster, Germany.
Kamil ZelenakClinic of Radiology, Comenius University in Bratislava Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Martin, Slovakia.
Maarten G LansbergDepartment of Neurology, Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Gregory W AlbersStanford Stroke Center, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Max WintermarkDepartment of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-7478
Jeremy J HeitRadiology, Neuroadiology and Neurointervention Division, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-8000
Universität Hamburg · DEStanford Medicine · USFondation de Rothschild · FRMartin University Hospital · SKStanford University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe determined whether a comprehensive assessment of cerebral collateral blood flow is associated with ischemic lesion edema growth in patients successfully treated by thrombectomy.

methodsThis was a multicenter retrospective study of ischemic stroke patients who underwent thrombectomy treatment of large vessel occlusions. Collateral status was determined using the cerebral collateral cascade (CCC) model, which comprises three components: arterial collaterals (Tan Scale) and venous outflow profiles (Cortical Vein Opacification Score) on CT angiography, and tissue-level collaterals (hypoperfusion intensity ratio) on CT perfusion. Quantitative ischemic lesion net water uptake (NWU) was used to determine edema growth between admission and follow-up non-contrast head CT (ΔNWU). Three groups were defined: CCC+ (good pial collaterals, tissue-level collaterals, and venous outflow), CCC- (poor pial collaterals, tissue-level collaterals, and venous outflow), and CCCmixed (remainder of patients). Primary outcome was ischemic lesion edema growth (ΔNWU). Multivariable regression models were used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes.

results538 patients were included. 157 patients had CCC+, 274 patients CCCmixed, and 107 patients CCC- profiles. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared with patients with CCC+ profiles, CCC- (β 1.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.30, P=0.003) and CCC mixed (β 1.65, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.56, P<0.001) profiles were associated with greater ischemic lesion edema growth (ΔNWU) after successful thrombectomy treatment. ΔNWU (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.8, P<0.001) and CCC+ (OR 13.39, 95% CI 4.88 to 36.76, P<0.001) were independently associated with functional independence.

conclusionA comprehensive assessment of cerebral collaterals using the CCC model is strongly associated with edema growth and functional independence in acute stroke patients successfully treated by endovascular thrombectomy.

Indexed as

Brain EdemaCerebrovascular CirculationCollateral CirculationIschemic StrokeThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStrokeThrombectomyVein

Identifiers

PMID37918909
PMCPMC11671880
OpenAlexW4388215813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.