Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918869›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Hospital care for critical illness in low-resource settings: lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mike English, Jacquie Oliwa, Karima Khalid, Onesmus Onyango, Tamara Mulenga Willows, Rosanna Mazhar, Elibariki Mkumbo, Lorna Guinness, Carl Otto Schell, Tim Baker and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Mike EnglishKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Services Unit, Nairobi, Kenya mike.english@ndm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7427-0826
Jacquie OliwaKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Services Unit, Nairobi, Kenya.
Karima KhalidMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Onesmus OnyangoKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Services Unit, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tamara Mulenga WillowsHealth Systems Collaborative, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0760-5574
Rosanna MazharHealth Systems Collaborative, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Elibariki MkumboIfakara Health Institute, Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Lorna GuinnessLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1013-4200
Carl Otto SchellDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-1336
Tim BakerMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-8727-7018
Jacob McKnightHealth Systems Collaborative, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1340-2618
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Oxford · GBIfakara Health Institute · TZLondon International Development Centre · GBMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZUppsala University · SE

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 207522Wellcome Trust 221571/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Care for the critically ill patients is often considered synonymous with a hospital having an intensive care unit. However, a focus on Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) may obviate the need for much intensive care. Severe COVID-19 presented a specific critical care challenge while also being an exemplar of critical illness in general. Our multidisciplinary team conducted research in Kenya and Tanzania on hospitals' ability to provide EECC as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded. Important basic inputs were often lacking, especially sufficient numbers of skilled health workers. However, we learnt that higher scores on resource readiness scales were often misleading, as resources were often insufficient or not functional in all the clinical areas they are needed. By following patient journeys, through interviews and group discussions, we revealed gaps in timeliness, continuity and delivery of care. Generic challenges in transitions between departments were identified in the receipt of critically ill patients, the ability to sustain monitoring and treatment and preparation for any subsequent transition. While the global response to COVID-19 focused initially on providing technologies and training, first ventilators and later oxygen, organisational and procedural challenges seemed largely ignored. Yet, they may even be exacerbated by new technologies. Efforts to improve care for the critically ill patients, which is a complex process, must include a whole system and whole facility view spanning all areas of patients' care and their transitions and not be focused on a single location providing 'critical care'. We propose a five-part strategy to support the system changes needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareCritical IllnessHospitalsHumansPandemicsCOVID-19Health services researchHealth systemsHospital-based study

Identifiers

PMID37918869
PMCPMC10626868
OpenAlexW4388217182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.