Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918816›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2023

The Case for Conducting Pragmatic Dementia Care Trials in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Settings.

Richard H Fortinsky, Noreen Shugrue, Julie T Robison, Laura N Gitlin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard H FortinskyUConn Center on Aging, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA. Electronic address: fortinsky@uchc.edu.
Noreen ShugrueUConn Center on Aging, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Julie T RobisonUConn Center on Aging, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Laura N GitlinCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
UConn Health · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Alexia Mary Torke · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG067988 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI Richard H Fortinsky, GEORGE A KUCHEL · 2021 to 2026
$9.5M
Translation of COPE for Publicly-Funded Home Care Clients and their FamiliesR01AG044504 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI FORTINSKY, RICHARD H · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
Impact of AD/ADRD on Health-Related Outcomes in a Statewide Population Enrolled in a Publicly-Funded HCBS Waiver Program for Older AdultsRF1AG069839 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI FORTINSKY, RICHARD H, ROBISON, JULIE THOMPSON · 2020 to 2020
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG067988NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044504NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG069839NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicaid-funded home and community-based services (HCBSs) reach large numbers of individuals living with dementia who would otherwise reside in nursing homes with Medicaid funding. Medicaid HCBSs also often augment care provided by family and other informal caregivers to individuals living with dementia. Although Medicaid-funded HCBSs are offered in most states in lieu of nursing home care, they have been largely overlooked as health care system partners for implementation and testing of evidence-based dementia care interventions using embedded pragmatic clinical trial (ePCT) designs. In this article, we make the case for the importance of Medicaid-funded HCBSs as dementia care ePCT partners because of the volume of vulnerable clients with dementia served and the potential positive impacts that evidence-based dementia care programs can have on clients and their informal caregivers. This article first characterizes the Medicaid HCBS setting in terms of populations served and organizational arrangements across states. We then characterize strengths and potential limitations presented by Medicaid HCBSs as settings within which to implement dementia care ePCTs, using as a conceptual framework the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2) tool and its domains. We draw on our experiences implementing the Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments (COPE) program in a statewide Medicaid HCBS setting to highlight how these potential ePCT partners can help optimize pragmatic approaches to several PRECIS-2 domains. We found that partners are especially effective in implementing pragmatic ways to determine eligibility for evidence-based dementia care programs; assist with recruitment of eligible individuals; incorporate dementia care interventions into the range of existing HCBSs; and track outcomes relevant to persons living with dementia, caregivers, HCBS providers, and Medicaid insurance stakeholders. We conclude with recommendations for researchers, potential ePCT partners, and policymakers to help facilitate the growth of dementia care ePCTs in Medicaid HCBS settings across the United States.

Indexed as

DementiaHome Care ServicesCommunity Health ServicesHumansLong-Term CareMedicaidUnited Statescaregivingevidence-based dementia carehealth equityimplementation scienceMedicaid long-term services and supportsPragmatic trials

Identifiers

PMID37918816
PMCPMC10795107
OpenAlexW4388101523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.