Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918811›Full record

ReviewJornal de pediatria

Marketing and child feeding.

Kátia Galeão Brandt, Giselia Alves Pontes da Silva

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kátia Galeão BrandtUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Centro de Ciências Médicas, Área Acadêmica de Pediatria, Recife, PE, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Centro de Ciências Médicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente, Recife, PE, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Gastroenterologia Pediátrica, Recife, PE, Brazil. Electronic address: katia.brandt@ufpe.br.
Giselia Alves Pontes da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Centro de Ciências Médicas, Área Acadêmica de Pediatria, Recife, PE, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Centro de Ciências Médicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo carry out a narrative review on the use of marketing strategies in child nutrition, as well as potential implications for health professionals and children. DATA SOURCE: Searches were carried out on the PubMed, SciELO, and Google platforms, using the terms "child nutrition" or "industrialized baby food" or "infant formula" or "breast milk" or "breastfeeding" and "marketing", with original articles, review articles, institutional reports, institutional position documents and websites considered relevant to the topic being analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Children's food marketing started with the industrialization of food and the resulting actions aimed at increasing sales and meeting commercial interests. Since its inception to the present, infant formulas have been the most widely used products, which has impacted breastfeeding practices. International and national institutions, that care for children's health, are searching for strategies to limit the abusive marketing of industrialized children's foods. Marketing strategies interfere with medical knowledge and actions, potentially influencing the guidance provided by pediatricians to families, and finally, compromising healthy eating practices at a critical period in life, with possible long-term effects.

conclusionsHealth professionals, especially pediatricians, must provide the best care for children and families, and need to maintain the search for quality scientific information, not influenced by conflicts of interest. Updated and critical knowledge on the part of healthcare professionals can curb marketing strategies that aim to influence their actions.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMarketingChildFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaMilk, HumanBreastfeedingChildhoodInfant formulaMarketingNutrition

Identifiers

PMID37918811
PMCPMC10960183
OpenAlexW4388049561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.