Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918482›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2024

Comparison of the effects of normothermic machine perfusion and cold storage preservation on porcine intestinal allograft regenerative potential and viability.

Elsa K Ludwig, Nader Abraham, Cecilia R Schaaf, Caroline A McKinney, John Freund, Amy S Stewart, Brittany A Veerasammy, Mallory Thomas, Diana M Cardona, Katherine Garman and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elsa K LudwigDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Nader AbrahamDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Cecilia R SchaafDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Caroline A McKinneyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
John FreundDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Amy S StewartDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Brittany A VeerasammyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Mallory ThomasDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Diana M CardonaDepartment of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Katherine GarmanDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Andrew S BarbasDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Debra L SudanDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: debra.sudan@duke.edu.
Liara M GonzalezDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: lmgonza4@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · USDuke University · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
Laboratory Animal & Comparative Medicine TrainingT32OD010957 · OD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI J. MARK CLINE · 2012 to 2026
$4.3M
Translational Research Workforce Training: Leveraging the Veterinary SpecialistU01TR002953 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI TREPANIER, LAUREN A · 2019 to 2024
$2.6M
Therapeutic strategies to improve function of high risk liver graftsK08AI150990 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BARBAS, ANDREW SERGHIOS · 2020 to 2022
$512k
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002953NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI150990NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIH HHS T32 OD010957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal transplantation (IT) is the final treatment option for intestinal failure. Static cold storage (CS) is the standard preservation method used for intestinal allografts. However, CS and subsequent transplantation induce ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Severe IRI impairs epithelial barrier function, including loss of intestinal stem cells (ISC), critical to epithelial regeneration. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) preservation of kidney and liver allografts minimizes CS-associated IRI; however, it has not been used clinically for IT. We hypothesized that intestine NMP would induce less epithelial injury and better protect the intestine's regenerative ability when compared with CS. Full-length porcine jejunum and ileum were procured, stored at 4 °C, or perfused at 34 °C for 6 hours (T6), and transplanted. Histology was assessed following procurement (T0), T6, and 1 hour after reperfusion. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunofluorescence, and crypt culture measured ISC viability and proliferative potential. A greater number of NMP-preserved intestine recipients survived posttransplant, which correlated with significantly decreased tissue injury following 1-hour reperfusion in NMP compared with CS samples. Additionally, ISC gene expression, spheroid area, and cellular proliferation were significantly increased in NMP-T6 compared with CS-T6 intestine. NMP appears to reduce IRI and improve graft regeneration with improved ISC viability and proliferation.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationReperfusion InjuryAllograftsAnimalsIntestinesLiverOrgan PreservationPerfusionSwinecold storageintestinal stem cellsintestinal transplantationischemia-reperfusion injurynormothermic machine perfusionpreservation injury

Identifiers

PMID37918482
PMCPMC11082874
OpenAlexW4388084045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.