Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918458›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2024

State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Policies and Substance Use Rates.

Rebecca B Naumann, Madeline Frank, Meghan E Shanahan, H Luz McNaughton Reyes, Alice S Ammerman, Giselle Corbie, Anna E Austin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Substance Use Disorders: Population Prevention.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Intersection of adverse childhood experiences, suicide and overdose prevention.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca B NaumannDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Madeline FrankInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Meghan E ShanahanInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
H Luz McNaughton ReyesInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Alice S AmmermanDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Giselle CorbieDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Anna E AustinInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: anna.austin@unc.edu.

Funding

Examining state SNAP policies as a primary prevention strategy for early life exposure to violence and other adverse childhood experiencesR01CE003334 · CE · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HATCHER, ABIGAIL MAE, SHANAHAN, MEGHAN · 2021 to 2023
$1.0M
NCIPC CDC HHS R01 CE003334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFood insecurity is associated with the development of substance misuse and use disorders (SUD). This study sought to estimate associations between state Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility policies and substance-related outcomes.

methods2014-2017 SNAP Policy Database and 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health state-level estimates were used to estimate associations between state SNAP eligibility policies and alcohol use disorder (AUD), opioid misuse, illicit drug use disorder (IDUD), SUD, and needing but not receiving SUD treatment. State SNAP policies included those that (1) do not disqualify individuals with a felony drug conviction from SNAP and/or (2) expand SNAP eligibility by increasing the income limit or removing the asset test. Analyses were conducted January-May 2023.

resultsStates that adopted both SNAP eligibility policies had reduced rates of AUD (adjusted rate ratio (aRR): 0.92; 95% CI 0.86, 0.99), opioid misuse (aRR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.89, 0.98), IDUD (aRR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.85, 0.98), SUD (aRR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.85, 0.97), and needing but not receiving SUD treatment (aRR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.87, 0.98) compared to states with neither policy. Among states that did not adopt increases to the income limit or removal of the asset test, those that removed the felony drug disqualification had lower rates of IDUD, SUD, and needing but not receiving SUD treatment, compared to those that maintained a disqualification.

conclusionsExpanded SNAP eligibility could help reduce rates of substance misuse and SUD. Opting out of the federal disqualification on SNAP participation for those with felony drug convictions may be particularly beneficial.

Indexed as

AlcoholismFood AssistanceOpioid-Related DisordersHumansIncomePovertyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37918458
PMCPMC12930790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.