Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37918371›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of allergy and immunology2024

Increasing Prevalence of Sensitization to Cat/Dog Allergens in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Recep Evcen, Fatih Çölkesen, Eray Yıldız, Filiz Sadi Aykan, Mehmet Kılınç, Fatma Arzu Akkuş, Sevket Arslan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Recep EvcenDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Fatih ÇölkesenDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Eray YıldızDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Necip Fazıl City Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.
Filiz Sadi AykanDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Mehmet KılınçDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Fatma Arzu AkkuşDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Sevket ArslanDivision of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Necmettin Erbakan University · TRŞanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCat and dog allergens are common indoor triggers for respiratory allergies such as allergic rhinitis and asthma. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of cat and dog allergies in adults and analyze changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 8,102 patients who visited an allergy clinic and underwent skin prick testing (SPT) from March 2018 to March 2022: 2 years before and 2 years during the pandemic. Demographic information, clinical attributes, and laboratory results were examined based on patient records.

resultsOf 8,102 SPTs performed, 400 (4.9%) were sensitized to cat allergen and 289 (3.6%) to dog allergen. Allergic rhinitis was the predominant clinical diagnosis in both groups. Of the 400 subjects exposed to cats, 240 (60%) experienced allergic symptoms, while of the 289 subjects exposed to dogs, 65 (22.5%) experienced allergic symptoms during exposure. Within the cat-sensitized group, anaphylaxis was observed in 5 patients (1.3%), while no cases of anaphylaxis were reported in the dog-sensitized group. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, patients presenting during the pandemic had higher rates of cat and dog sensitization (5.7% vs. 4.1%; p < 0.05, 5.2% vs. 1.7%; p < 0.05).

conclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in cat and dog allergies among adults. Increased exposure to pet antigens, both directly and indirectly, has resulted in more people becoming sensitized to cats or dogs.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisCOVID-19Rhinitis, AllergicAdultAllergensAnimalsCatsDogsHumansPandemicsPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSkin TestsAllergensCat sensitivityCOVID-19Dog sensitivityFurry animalsPrevalenceRhinitis

Identifiers

PMID37918371
PMCPMC11251650
OpenAlexW4388210613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.