ArticlePloS one2023
Response retention and apparent motion effect in visual cortex models.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interaction of Functional Brain Networks Is Associated With k-Clique Percolation in the Human Structural Connectome.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apparent motion is a visual illusion in which stationary stimuli, flashing in distinct spatial locations at certain time intervals, are perceived as one stimulus moving between these locations. In the primary visual cortex, apparent-motion stimuli produce smooth spatio-temporal patterns of activity similar to those produced by continuously moving stimuli. An important prerequisite for producing such activity patterns is prolongation of responses to brief stimuli. Indeed, a brief stimulus can evoke in the visual cortex a long response, outlasting the stimulus by hundreds of milliseconds. Here we use firing-rate based models with simple ring structure, and biologically-detailed conductance-based refractory density (CBRD) model with retinotopic space representation to analyze the response retention and the origin of smooth profiles of activity in response to apparent-motion stimuli. We show that the strength of recurrent connectivity is the major factor that endorses neuronal networks with the ability for response retention. The same strengths of recurrent connections mediate the appearance of bump attractor in the ring models. Factors such as synaptic depression, NMDA receptor mediated currents, and conductances regulating spike adaptation influence response retention, but cannot substitute for the weakness of recurrent connections to reproduce response retention in models with weak connectivity. However, the weakness of lateral recurrent connections can be compensated by layering: in multi-layer models even with weaker connections the activity retains due to its feedforward propagation from layer to layer. Using CBRD model with retinotopic space representation we further show that smooth spatio-temporal profiles of activity in response to apparent-motion stimuli are produced in the models expressing response retention, but not in the models that fail to produce response retention. Together, these results demonstrate a link between response retention and the ability of neuronal networks to generate spatio-temporal patterns of activity, which are compatible with perception of apparent motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.