Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37917614›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2023

Discrimination and Adverse Perinatal Health Outcomes: A Latent Class Analysis.

Emily A Doherty, Kathleen Cartmell, Sarah Griffin, Moonseong Heo, Liwei Chen, Jessica L Britt, Amy H Crockett

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stressful life events in electronic health records: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily A DohertyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Kathleen CartmellDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Sarah GriffinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Moonseong HeoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Liwei ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
Jessica L BrittDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Greenville, South Carolina.
Amy H CrockettDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Greenville, South Carolina.
Clemson University · USPrisma Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Reducing disparities in birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial on CenteringPregnancyR01HD082311 · NICHD · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI CROCKETT, AMY HAIRSTON, HEO, MOONSEONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn intersectionality framework recognizes individuals as simultaneously inhabiting multiple intersecting social identities embedded within systems of disadvantage and privilege. Previous research links perceived discrimination with worsened health outcomes yet is limited by a focus on racial discrimination in isolation. We applied an intersectional approach to the study of discrimination to examine the association with adverse perinatal health outcomes.

methodsWe analyzed data from a cohort of 2,286 pregnant participants (Black, n = 933; Hispanic, n = 471; White, n = 853; and Other, n = 29) from the Centering and Racial Disparities trial. Perceived discrimination was assessed via the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) and perinatal health outcomes collected via electronic medical record review. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of discrimination based on EDS item response and the rate of adverse perinatal health outcomes compared between subgroups using a Bolck, Croon and Hagenaars 3-step approach.

resultsFour discrimination subgroups were identified: no discrimination, general discrimination, discrimination attributed to one or several social identities, and discrimination attributed to most or all social identities. Experiencing general discrimination was associated with postpartum depression symptoms when compared with experiencing no discrimination among Black (9% vs 5%, P = .04) and White participants (18% vs 9%, P = .01). White participants experiencing general discrimination gave birth to low birthweight infants at a higher rate than those experiencing no discrimination (11% vs 6%, P = .04). No significant subgroup differences were observed among Hispanic participants.

conclusionPerceived discrimination may play an influential role in shaping perinatal health. More research applying an intersectional lens to the study of discrimination and perinatal health outcomes is needed.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumMaternal HealthRacismBlack or African AmericanFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLatent Class AnalysisPregnancyRacial GroupsWhite

Identifiers

PMID37917614
PMCPMC10625434
OpenAlexW4388104308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.