ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023
Neurophysiologic cut off values for safe resection of patients with supratentorial gliomas.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGliomas have infiltrative nature and tumor volume has direct prognostic value. Optimal resection limits delineated by high-frequency monopolar stimulation with multipulse short train technique is still a matter of debate for safe surgery without (or with acceptable) neurological deficits. It is also an enigma whether the same cut-off values are valid for high and low grades. We aimed to analyze the value of motor mapping/monitoring findings on postoperative motor outcome in diffuse glioma surgery.
methodsPatients who were operated on due to glioma with intraoperative neuromonitorization at our institution between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. Demographic information, pre- and post-operative neurological deficit, magnetic resonance images, resection rates, and motor evoked potential (MEP) findings were analyzed.
resultsEighty-seven patients of whom 55 had high-grade tumors were included in the study. Total/near-total resection was achieved in 85%. Subcortical motor threshold (ScMTh) from resection cavity to the corticospinal tract was ≤ 2mA in 17; 3 mA in 14; 4 mA in 6; 5 mA in 7, and ≥5mA in 50 patients. On the 6th month examination, six patients (5 with high-grade tumor) had motor deficits. These patients had changes in MEP that exceeded critical threshold during monitoring. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed 2.5 mA ScMTh as the cut-off point for limb paresis after awakening and 6 months for the groups.
conclusionsSubcortical mapping with MEP monitoring helps to achieve safe wider resection. The optimal safe limit for SCMTh was determined as 2.5 mA. Provided that safe threshold values are maintained in MEP, surgeon may force the functional limits by lowering the SCMTh to 1 mA, especially in low-grade gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.