Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37917315›Full record

SynthesisClinical child and family psychology review2024

Universal Digital Programs for Promoting Mental and Relational Health for Parents of Young Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jessica E Opie, Timothy B Esler, Elizabeth M Clancy, Bradley Wright, Felicity Painter, An Vuong, Anna T Booth, Louise Newman, Ange Johns-Hayden, Mohajer Hameed and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Online Parenting Programs for Children's Behavioral and Emotional Problems: a Network Meta-Analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. MERTILChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica E OpieLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. j.opie@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0559-0842
Timothy B Esler, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0133-1226
Elizabeth M ClancySchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-7203
Bradley WrightLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6428-9128
Felicity PainterLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7595-0655
An VuongLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-3510
Anna T BoothLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8945-4778
Louise NewmanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6133-5694
Ange Johns-HaydenLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4657-0506
Mohajer HameedLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2882-5894
Leesa HookerJudith Lumley Centre and La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4499-1139
Craig OlssonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5927-2014
Jennifer E McIntoshLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-5003
La Trobe University · AUDeakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUSeattle University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital parenting programs aim to increase program access, improve psychosocial outcomes for parents and children, and support triage to targeted interventions where required. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of online parenting programs in improving parenting skills and capabilities, and by consequence, the mental health and well-being of parents and children, and the quality of the parent-child relationship. Studies were included if they were: (1) online, (2) self-delivered, (3) designed for universal general population prevention, (4) evaluated experimental or quasi-experimental designs, and (5) assessed parent and child emotional and/or relational health, from pregnancy to 5 years of age. A systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature identified 22 studies that met inclusion criteria, including 24 independent samples, with 5671 unique parents. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models and Cohen's d effects. Small-to-moderate improvements in parent depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, and social support were observed. No effects on parent stress, satisfaction, or parent-child relationship quality were observed. Meta-regression and sub-group analysis were conducted to identify sensitivity or moderation effects. Collectively, findings suggest any benefits of online parenting programs mostly occur at the time of the intervention, for parent mental health and well-being outcomes, and that enduring effects are unlikely. However, given the cost effectiveness and accessibility of online programs, further research into ways of sustaining effects on parenting outcomes is warranted. Furthermore, given the centrality of the parent-child bond to child development across the lifecourse, additional investment in new digitally facilitated approaches focusing on this bond are likewise warranted.PROSPERO registration CRD42021275647.

Indexed as

ParentingParentsAnxietyChildChild, PreschoolChild RearingEmotionsHumansMeta-analysisOnline parent programsParent–child relationshipsParent mental healthRelational healthReviewSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37917315
PMCPMC10920439
OpenAlexW4388224865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.