Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37917252›Full record

ArticleBiodegradation2024

Simultaneous biodegradation kinetics of 1,4-dioxane and ethane.

Ermias Gebrekrstos Tesfamariam, Yi-Hao Luo, Chen Zhou, Ming Ye, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown, Bruce E Rittmann, Youneng Tang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biodegradation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ermias Gebrekrstos TesfamariamDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida State University, 2525 Pottsdamer Street Suite A132, Tallahassee, FL, 32310, USA.
Yi-Hao LuoBiodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Chen ZhouBiodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Ming YeDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32304, USA.
Rosa Krajmalnik-BrownBiodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Bruce E RittmannBiodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Youneng TangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida State University, 2525 Pottsdamer Street Suite A132, Tallahassee, FL, 32310, USA. ytang@eng.famu.fsu.edu.
Arizona State University · USFlorida A&M University - Florida State University College of Engineering · USFlorida State University · US

Funding

Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program ER-2721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodegradation of 1,4-Dioxane at environmentally relevant concentrations usually requires the addition of a primary electron-donor substrate to sustain biomass growth. Ethane is a promising substrate, since it is available as a degradation product of 1,4-Dioxane's common co-contaminants. This study reports kinetic parameters for ethane biodegradation and co-oxidations of ethane and 1,4-Dioxane. Based on experiments combined with mathematical modeling, we found that ethane promoted 1,4-Dioxane biodegradation when the initial mass ratio of ethane:1,4-Dioxane was < 9:1 mg COD/mg COD, while it inhibited 1,4-Dioxane degradation when the ratio was > 9:1. A model-independent estimator was used for kinetic-parameter estimation, and all parameter values for 1,4-Dioxane were consistent with literature-reported ranges. Estimated parameters support competitive inhibition between ethane as the primary substrate and 1,4-Dioxane as the secondary substrate. The results also support that bacteria that co-oxidize ethane and 1,4-Dioxane had a competitive advantage over bacteria that can use only one of the two substrates. The minimum concentration of ethane to sustain ethane-oxidizing bacteria and ethane and 1,4-Dioxane-co-oxidizing bacteria was 0.09 mg COD/L, which is approximately 20-fold lower than the minimum concentration reported for propane, another common substrate used to promote 1,4-Dioxane biodegradation. The minimum 1,4-Dioxane concentration required to sustain steady-state biomass with 1,4-Dioxane as the sole primary substrate was 1.3 mg COD/L. As 1,4-Dioxane concentrations at most groundwater sites are less than 0.18 mg COD/L, providing ethane as a primary substrate is vital to support biomass growth and consequently enable 1,4-Dioxane bioremediation.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalDioxanesEthaneBacteriaKineticsOxidation-Reduction1,4-dioxaneDioxanesEthane1,4-DioxaneBiodegradationBioremediationCo-oxidationEthaneKinetics

Identifiers

PMID37917252
OpenAlexW4388223368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.