Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37917245›Full record

SynthesisCognitive processing2024

The influence of classical music on learning and memory in rats: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clarissa Trzesniak, Ana C L Biscaro, Amanda V Sardeli, Iara S L Faria, Cesar R Sartori, Luciano Magalhães Vitorino, Rodolfo S Faria

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cognitive processing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Taylor Swift versus Mozart: music preferences of C57BL/6J mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clarissa TrzesniakLaboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Itajubá (FMIT), 368, Av. Renó Júnior, Itajubá, MG, 37502-138, Brazil. clarissa.trzesniak@fmit.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-9959
Ana C L BiscaroLaboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Itajubá (FMIT), 368, Av. Renó Júnior, Itajubá, MG, 37502-138, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-7006
Amanda V SardeliLaboratory of Exercise Physiology (FISEX), State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-7996
Iara S L FariaLaboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Itajubá (FMIT), 368, Av. Renó Júnior, Itajubá, MG, 37502-138, Brazil.
Cesar R SartoriDepartment of Structural and Functional Biology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2713-3914
Luciano Magalhães VitorinoFaculty of Medicine of Itajubá (FMIT), Itajubá, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-8488
Rodolfo S FariaLaboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Itajubá (FMIT), 368, Av. Renó Júnior, Itajubá, MG, 37502-138, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-8950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the learning process, music can activate important neural areas in the brain, promoting the retention of information and memory formation. However, studies testing music effects on memory had found different improvements, which could be due to the methodological differences across studies. Thus, the purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature and meta-analyze the effects of music on Rattus norvegicus' explicit memory (Maze tests) only in controlled investigations. The seven studies included led to a very homogeneous analysis (I

Indexed as

MusicAnimalsBrainMaze LearningMemoryRatsClassical musicExplicit memoryMaze learningMeta-analyzeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37917245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.