Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37917204›Full record

ArticleJournal of plant research2024

Comparative complete chloroplast genome of Geum japonicum: evolution and phylogenetic analysis.

Junbo Xie, Yujing Miao, Xinke Zhang, Guoshuai Zhang, Baolin Guo, Guangming Luo, Linfang Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plant research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junbo XieKey Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Resources Conservation, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yujing MiaoKey Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Resources Conservation, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xinke ZhangKey Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Resources Conservation, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China.
Guoshuai ZhangKey Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Resources Conservation, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China.
Baolin GuoKey Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Resources Conservation, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China.
Guangming LuoSchool of Pharmacy, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330000, China. jzlgm88@163.com.
Linfang HuangKey Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Resources Conservation, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100193, China. lfhuang@implad.ac.cn.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences CIFMS, 2022-I2M-1-017Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China U1812403-1National Science and Technology Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period 2018FY100701State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources SKLTCM2022015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geum japonicum (Rosaceae) has been widely used in China as a traditional herbal medicine due to its high economic and medicinal value. However, the appearance of Geum species is relatively similar, making identification difficult by conventional phenotypic methods, and the studies of genomics and species evolution are lacking. To better distinguish the medicinal varieties and fill this gap, we carried out relevant research on the chloroplast genome of G. japonicum. Results show a typical quadripartite structure of the chloroplast genome of G. japonicum with a length of 156,042 bp. There are totally 131 unique genes in the genome, including 87 protein-coding genes, 36 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes, and there were also 87 SSRs identified and mostly mononucleotide Adenine-Thymine. We next compared the plastid genomes among four Geum species and obtained 14 hypervariable regions, including ndhF, psbE, trnG-UCC, ccsA, trnQ-UUG, rps16, psbK, trnL-UAA, ycf1, ndhD, atpA, petN, rps14, and trnK-UUU. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that G. japonicum is most closely related to Geum aleppicum, and possibly has some evolutionary relatedness with an ancient relic plant Taihangia rupestris. This research enriched the genome resources and provided fundamental insights for evolutionary studies and the phylogeny of Geum.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastGeumChloroplastsGenomicsPhylogenyChloroplast genomeComparative analysisGeum japonicumPhylogenetic relationshipRosaceaeStructural characteristics

Identifiers

PMID37917204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.