SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2024
Recurrent urinary tract infection genetic risk: a systematic review and gene network analysis.
Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovations in Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- A Precision Medicine Model for Targeted Antibiotic Therapy in Urinary Tract Infections: A Valuable Tool to Reduce Hospitalization Stay and the Time to Switch to Oral Treatment.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe development of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) is not completely understood. This review is aimed at investigating the connection between genetics and rUTIs and summarizing the results of studies that have documented variations in gene expression among individuals with rUTIs compared with healthy individuals.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, Ovid, and PubMed, limiting the results to articles published between 1 January 2000, and 5 July 2022. Only studies comparing the difference in gene expression between individuals with rUTI and healthy individuals utilizing molecular techniques to measure gene expression in blood or urine samples were included in this systematic review. Gene network and pathways analyses were performed using Cytoscape software, with input data obtained from our systematic review of differentially expressed genes in rUTIs.
resultsSix studies met our criteria for inclusion. The selected studies used molecular biology methods to quantify gene expression data from blood specimens. The analysis revealed that gene expressions of CXCR1 and TLR4 decreased, whereas CXCR2, TRIF, and SIGIRR increased in patients with rUTI compared with healthy controls. The analysis demonstrated that the most significant pathways were associated with TLR receptor signaling and tolerance, I-kappa B kinase/NF-kappa B signaling, and MyD88-independent TLR signaling.
conclusionsThis systematic review uncovered gene expression variations in several candidate genes and identified a number of underlying biological pathways associated with rUTIs. These findings could shift the treatment and prevention strategies for rUTIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.