Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37917147›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2023

Experiences of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using the Apple Watch Series 6 Versus the Traditional Finger Pulse Oximeter for Home SpO2 Self-Monitoring: Qualitative Study Part 2.

Yuxin Liu, Antonia Arnaert, Daniel da Costa, Pia Sumbly, Zoumanan Debe, Sylvain Charbonneau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Real-Time SpOSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuxin LiuIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3862-164X
Antonia Arnaert *Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-7058
Daniel da CostaIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7971-6287
Pia SumblyIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6892-4441
Zoumanan DebeIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-5947
Sylvain Charbonneau *Academic Affairs, Teaching and Research Directorate, Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Service Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2333-9889
McGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmid the rise in mobile health, the Apple Watch now has the capability to measure peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO

objectiveThis qualitative study explored the experiences of patients with COPD using the Apple Watch Series 6 versus a traditional finger pulse oximeter for home SpO

methodsWe conducted individual semistructured interviews with 8 female and 2 male participants with moderate to severe COPD, and transcripts were qualitatively analyzed. All received a watch to monitor their SpO

resultsDue to respiratory distress, the watch was unable to collect reliable SpO

conclusionsDiffering results between participant preferences and smartwatch limitations warrant further investigation into the reliability and accuracy of the SpO

Indexed as

Apple Watchchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasepulse oximeterqualitative descriptiveself-monitoringsmartwatch

Identifiers

PMID37917147
PMCPMC10654900
OpenAlexW4382243273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.